Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Christian > Life Issues > Dating & Relationships
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2005, 03:23 PM   #16
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarah_13
"Love is not affectionate feeling, but a steady wish for the loved person's ultimate good as far as it can be obtained."
C.S. Lewis
But is that what being "in love" is?

__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-07-2005, 03:52 PM   #17
so much
 
Nate's Avatar
 

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,067
Being in love = healthily and correctly directed infatuation.

In His love,
Nate
__________________

"(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or
recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Texas Constitution, Article I, Section 32"
Nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 04:14 PM   #18
Registered User
 

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 184
Being "in love" has more substance to it because it is based upon a firm understanding of the other person and who they are. Its a genuine feeling with more clarity than infatuation, which I would say is an extremely blind feeling.

BTW. Being "in love" in a relationship is different to real love, for anyone who got confused earlier. "In love" is a feeling that is in response to the act of loving someone.
JWillett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 07:21 PM   #19
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,912
So, it's impossible to love someone until you know them well? And if you're infatuated with someone and then you get to know them, are you automatically in love with them because you have an understanding of who they are?
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 11:06 PM   #20
titletitletitle
 
jbm222's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,692
I really don't like the word love. It's very vague and in the context of modern American English it can take on vastly different meanings.

Infatuation almost always refers to something fleeting, shallow, imature, etc. In other words, a crush.

When you're truely concerned about the other person's well being more than your own, and you begin to share that person's joy and pain as though it were your own, and the time you spend with that person undoubtedly makes you happier than you've ever been before, you're "in love."

Also, "in love" can refer to an infatuation where a person is convinced it's deeper and more meaningful even though it's not. When someone begins to devote their entire being to a relationship that's based on something supraficial (sorry, if that's spelled wrong).

And you can fall "in love" with things you would never be infatuated. People say they "love" chocalate cake or new cars or leaves on the trees in autumn.

Or "in love" could mean you're visiting some little town which is probably in tenesee or new england somewhere.
__________________
-brian

jbm222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 02:48 AM   #21
Moderator
 
bread man's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,598
Send a message via AIM to bread man Send a message via MSN to bread man
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthecockroach
Is being "in love" just a feeling?
In the contexts I have mostly heard it used, yes. However, the meaning of the phrase is hard to define.
__________________
blog
myspace.
CD reviews.
paper cranes.
frostmourne

I'd love to believe there was something for me
where we could just live like living should be
bread man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 04:50 PM   #22
Why am I still here?
 
ApparentlyNothing's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,527
We need to define "infatuation" and "in love" before we can start comparing and contrasting the two.

It is my understanding that neither is true love. Infatuation, or "cathexis", is "the process of attraction, investment, and commitment". To some, this may sound like love, but it can very easily be devoid of true love, because this is often accompanied by dependency, which is seeking your own nourishment and no more. Being "in love" at least to me, is associated with "falling in love", which is just another way of talking about cathexis. In our every day lives, most people use "in love" to describe only cathexis or infatuation. Though, true love can be accompanied by cathexis as well. But it is not love in it of itself. Cathexis often develops in to true love though. But true love is "the will to extend one's self for the purpose of nurturing one's own or another's spiritual growth". "Spiritual" is not purely referring to our Christian walks, but basically any growth in our inner beings.

So, to answer your question, I think that "infatuation" and "in love" are often used interchangebly, though "in love" can sometimes actually refer to true love, or at least be a stronger form of infatuation.

BTW, I got most of my info and quotes from The Road Less Traveled by M. Scott Peck, an incredible book that has a whole section on Love. It's really good. Everyone should read it.
__________________
ApparentlyNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 05:20 PM   #23
Your car crash eyes...
 
Mattlock's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Detroit...
Posts: 10,579
Infatuation is like lust. It's centered around yourself, not the other individual.

Love is the opposite, it's about the other person.
__________________
Nobody (not even the rain) has such small hands.
Mattlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 05:26 PM   #24
Why am I still here?
 
ApparentlyNothing's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattlock
Infatuation is like lust. It's centered around yourself, not the other individual.

Love is the opposite, it's about the other person.
I think it must be stated that in order to truely love someone else, you must first love yourself. Self sacrifice is not love in it of itself, although it can be at times. But it is not always. Self sacrifice is only true love if it brings about the growth of the other. For example letting your husband walk all over you and do whatever he wants is self sacrifice, but it is not love.

Not challenging your statement, Matt. Just adding to it.
__________________
ApparentlyNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 08:25 PM   #25
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,912
Well, I'll throw out my thoughts now. I completely agree that "infatuation" and being "in love" refer to the same thing. The real difference seems to be in the connotation (infatuation is bad, being in love is good). The basic idea, which I would define as a desire for intimacy, is the same. Thus, in order to separate the terms, it makes sense to use infatuation to refer to a poorly-directed desire for intimacy and "in love" to refer to a well-directed desire for intimacy.

The reason I ask at all is because I often see people asking (usually rhetorically) whether someone is just infatuated with another or whether they are actually "in love" with them. I have never quite understood what people meant by that. Not that I understand any better now, but I at least see some different views on the subject.
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2005, 09:33 PM   #26
so much
 
Nate's Avatar
 

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobthecockroach
Thus, in order to separate the terms, it makes sense to use infatuation to refer to a poorly-directed desire for intimacy and "in love" to refer to a well-directed desire for intimacy.
I wish I had said that.
__________________

"(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or
recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
Texas Constitution, Article I, Section 32"
Nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 12:20 AM   #27
Puts the sexy in dyslexia
 
Dr. Worm's Avatar
 

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate
Being in love = healthily and correctly directed infatuation.

In His love,
Nate
Which is basically nothing more than a less eloquent way of saying what I've said all along.
Dr. Worm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2005, 12:46 AM   #28
Why am I still here?
 
ApparentlyNothing's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yojimbo
I don't think infatuation is bad. I think it's an early, immature stage of love...adolescence compared to adulthood.
Ya, like what I said. It can often times develop in to true love, but it is not love in it of itself. If we wanted to put things in chronological order, it probably most often goes: infatuation, "in love", true love.
__________________
ApparentlyNothing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.