Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Government & Economics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-14-2004, 05:26 PM   #46
Registered User
 

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_01
Maybe you think it would be better to kinda forget about it, like it never happened, and didn't change our country at all?
No, not at all. I forget who said it-"Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it."

We should never forget, but Im also numb towards it.

blindfoldgag is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-14-2004, 05:29 PM   #47
Registered User
 

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by I have no brain
Yes and we also knew then that it was Bin Ladin who had ordered those attackes, Bill Clinton then had the chance to order CIA to take out Bin Ladin, but he chose not to, thus 9-11 occurred. Passivism does not work in all cases.
Yeah, and from when I was watching the history channel, Clinton knew that Osama was in this one camp. But there was also a member of the Saudi family there, so he didnt bomb it.

Which was more important? Oil or terrorism in that? And why was a Saudi member there?
blindfoldgag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2004, 06:11 PM   #48
Registered User
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,801
Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas

Last edited by Young Twig; 04-18-2010 at 12:43 PM.
Young Twig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 05:48 AM   #49
Real candidate of change
 
JerryLove's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,259
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Yeah, and from when I was watching the history channel, Clinton knew that Osama was in this one camp. But there was also a member of the Saudi family there, so he didnt bomb it.
Osama is a member of the Saudi Royal family. I doubt your claim.

Though Clinton has stated that he should have been less concerned with trying to capture him and had greater millitairy involvement. In 1998, Clinton did indeed attack a camp where Bin Lauden was supposed to be. http://www.ishipress.com/osamasur.htm

Quote:
Which was more important? Oil or terrorism in that?
Ask the president who diverted reasources sufficient to get BinLauden to invade Iraq.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 06:54 AM   #50
She's a guitar hero!
 
Dave H's Avatar
 

Joined: Jan 2004
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 3,430
Send a message via AIM to Dave H
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove
Osama is a member of the Saudi Royal family. I doubt your claim.

Though Clinton has stated that he should have been less concerned with trying to capture him and had greater millitairy involvement. In 1998, Clinton did indeed attack a camp where Bin Lauden was supposed to be. http://www.ishipress.com/osamasur.htm

Ask the president who diverted reasources sufficient to get BinLauden to invade Iraq.
I thought the Bin-Ladens were just a wealthy and powerful family, i didn't realize they were royalty as well. Are you sure that's accurate?
Dave H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2004, 07:12 AM   #51
Real candidate of change
 
JerryLove's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,259
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Good catch... you are correct (I just looked). That said, I still doubt the claim made. I'm aware of a couple of failed attempts that I know reasons for, and that's not a reason I'm familiar with.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 AM.