Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Government & Economics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2004, 07:25 PM   #16
Registered User
 
sgary's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2004
Location: hoosier
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaid_child
yes, one vote does matter.... but we all know deep down that either kerry or bush will win.

With that said, if you don't vote for Bush, then that's one less votte Kerry will need to get to beat him someplace.

Hence... half your non-vote goes to kerry in theory.
So then a vote for change is: "not good" (the king has no clothes) No third, fourth, or fifth parties aloud!..??

Or, it's time to change the, "deep down, we all know" mind-set, for a diffrent, and better way. More parties is just a step, in a diffrent direction. When our country was first set up, the three/four parties were good, for more choice.

To say a vote is "half", or "lost", because of the way it was cast, would give the false impression to: NOT VOTE. (because it doesen't count) This is the best way we have to be heard, and may take awhile to: "be heard" sgary

sgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-19-2004, 01:23 PM   #17
I'm an idiot!
 
maadio's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,633
Send a message via AIM to maadio
I'm just saying in an election as crucial as this one where I know that the third party candidate can't win no matter how ridiculous his platform is, it would be irresponsible of me to vote for someone who isn't going to win. That's all. I'd be very happy if third party candidates have a chance down the road; they just don't this time around.

I'm voting for Jerry to cut off your hands.
__________________
[ [ maadio ] ]
maadio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 08:00 PM   #18
Registered User
 
sgary's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2004
Location: hoosier
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaid_child
I'm just saying in an election as crucial as this one where I know that the third party candidate can't win no matter how ridiculous his platform is, it would be irresponsible of me to vote for someone who isn't going to win. That's all. I'd be very happy if third party candidates have a chance down the road; they just don't this time around.

I'm voting for Jerry to cut off your hands.
I don't think it would be "irresponsible" to vote for a loser, even when he/she stands for what you want? I call that a vote for change. I also think your right about the time for the third party, (no way to win this time) but when the two party system, looks at the turn-out for this election, they will scramble for 2008.

And you don't have to vote for Jerry, he has the knife ready, no matter what. sgary
sgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 AM.