Quote:
csbassplayer said:
Yeah it seems the general consenses is that Yamaha acoustics are the way to go for learning(talked to a guy that bought one for $100 bucks) The only reason i was considereing electric is that i already have an amp that plays elect guitar pretty well so i wouldnt' need to spring for one(Ibanez soundwave 31watt) I plugged in my friend's telecaster and it sounded pretty good once i tweated the eq some. Thanks for all the input guys I really appreciate it.
|
Well, I would respectfully and fundamentally disagree.
In my experience, an electric is about 3 times easier to learn on that an acoustic, for a number of reasons.
First, electrics are smaller than acoustics, so it's a lot easier to get in there and play. I.E., you're not hugging a wooden box. Now, if you are just
all about that romantic, earthy quality of an acoustic, then great. What I call the Kumbiya Dynamic.

Nothing wrong with that, but either way, you are not going to get that rich of an acoustic experience at $100 a pop.
Second, they don't require heavy strings. Acoustics do, because they are mechanical passive and you need that increased string tension to move the top of the sound box and create air movement. Electrics are active (not to be confused with passive vs active pickups) and because the pickups are generating the sound, you don't have to have such heavy strings. As a result, you can learn with 8's instead of 11's or 12's (for instance) and work on
encoding the various patterns and forms into your
mind,
memory, and
muscles. Then, later, you can build up strength and calouses and what not.
Third, because you are using smaller strings, and because of the construction of the guitar, it's much easier to set the guitar action a lot lower, making it infinitely more playable, which once again allows you to
encode the information more easily and readily. Because of it's construction, you cannot
set-up an acoustic as easily and thoroughly as an electric.
Fourth, a related side-issue, if you have any probs with an acoustic or an electric, it's a lot easier to repair an electric, since everything (in the case of a Strat or Strat-clone) just screws off or un-bolts. IOW, electrics are modular and acoustics are not. That can come in real handy. On most electrics, you can do a lot of the work yourself. On acoustics, you would definitely want to take it in to a Luthier or Guitar Tech. Like I said, side-issue, but it is hard to learn to play guitar if it's in the shop for long stretchs of time.
Fifth, you already play electric bass guitar, so you already have some experience with electric guitar. It would all get down to adaptation of what you already know, vs. adjusting to a completely new and foreign experience.
Sixth, you already have an amp, so you're good to go!!
Those are the immediate advantages that I would see in an electric guitar.
Also, while on the subject, check out the
Fretboard Logic SE discussion in Theory Sub-Forum.
http://www.christianguitar.org/forum...ad.php?t=62363 FBL SE deals with what can be called
Guitar Mechanics, which is all the mechanics of barre chords, scale forms, and lots of stuff on the guitar which for the most part doesn't show up on bass, nor in
General Music Theory for that matter. Granted, there's a lot of overlap with bass, but there are some key differences that a bass player, like a piano player, wouldn't pick up on, unless he knew what to look for. I know this from experience because I started on bass first and then piano, and knew tons of Theory, and then got into guitar only after I got
FBL SE. Before that, Guitar was just plan confusing. After that, it was
stupid simple.
Chesh