Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Deeper Issues > Academics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-19-2003, 05:21 PM   #1
Crushy McSternum
H.M. Murdock's Avatar

Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Ball, Louisiana.
Posts: 7,671
U.S. Constitution: Outdated? Useless?

Okay... I've been reading more and more about how, in debate and such, people argue that the Constitution should not be the highest man-made laws in the country because it is so old and can be taken is so many ways, blah blah blah.
Personally, I disagree. To change the very set of laws the country was founded on is idiocy at its peak, to be blunt.
Anyway... I'm just trying to explore opinions and such. What thinkest thou, deep people of the world?
(Sorry if this goes somewhere else, mods.)



Now thou hast loved me one whole day,
To-morrow when thou leavest, what wilt thou say ?
Wilt thou then antedate some new-made vow ?
Or say that now
We are not just those persons which we were ?
-Woman's Constancy (John Donne)
H.M. Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Unread 11-19-2003, 05:26 PM   #2
Bryan's Avatar

Joined: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,606
Send a message via Yahoo to Bryan Send a message via Skype™ to Bryan
off to Government and Economics this goes...

It's Time
Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-19-2003, 09:58 PM   #3
Real candidate of change
JerryLove's Avatar

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,237
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
The law should be consistant, but it should never stand still. The argument to remove the constitution s, I suspect, a straw man... Now if you want to argue weather the constitution should be unalterable or not, that would be hypocritical (as the Constitution has provisions for it's own change).
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-19-2003, 11:00 PM   #4
A fan of the lemer[sic]
+Donny's Avatar

Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Nowhere, ID
Posts: 17,861
Send a message via AIM to +Donny
Yes, this is sort of a tough question. The Constitution says itself to be the supreme law of the land, but also is alterable (as men are fallible). This means that the Constitution, plus any amendments, is the supreme law of the land. The Supreme Court is supposed to make sure other laws don'g violate the supreme law of the land and, provided a large majority of states in favor, the Constitution (and thus the supreme law of the land) can be altered.

So Jerry is right. The highest law in this country is not static and does change. This is good, as men find mistakes or good and beneficial additions to add to the Constitution, they can act accordingly. Because of the high number of states needed to approve of the amendment, this isn't easy, obviously to prevent tyrants trying to change the Constitution to fit their needs (as some claim happened with the civil war era and those amendments). So what the "Constitution" says really depends on what time period you speak of because of the amendments. As far as interpretting the Constitution's meaning, that is the Supreme Court's job. Because of the high status of their job, they should be checked against bad decisions better than they are, but thus is our system.
"Well, this is extremely interesting," said the Episcopal Ghost. "It's a point of view. Certainly, it's a point of view."
+Donny is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-20-2003, 10:32 AM   #5
Is Back!
Brandon's Avatar

Joined: Jan 2002
Location: Russellville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,864
Send a message via AIM to Brandon Send a message via MSN to Brandon
The Constitution of the United States is a LIVING DOCUMENT.

This means it is able to change and be changed. Ever up to standards, It is the supreme law of the land...
Brandon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-20-2003, 11:02 AM   #6
Ted Logan's Avatar

Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,177
The Constitution is the highest law in the land and has a mechanism for its own evolution such as to stay consistent with the changing needs of society. That mechanism is amendment. The amendment process is deliberately difficult and slow-moving. This is good. The people who want the Constitution to no longer be considered the highest law are those who hold views that are contra to the founding principles of our country, or who want law to change with the whim of popular trend. The Constitution is not static, but it is authoritative.
broccolifish at SoundCloud - synthpop and chiptunes I've made

Give thanks to YHWH, for He is good!

Ted Logan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-20-2003, 11:12 AM   #7
No 1337 outside CPF!
Mathaytace ><>'s Avatar

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,010
[sarcasm]No, I don't think we should have free speach.

I don't think that we should be given the right to practice our faith freely.

We definitely should not have the right to defend ourselves.


Now, I stand beside the constitution.

Many have died for the Rights I hold as a citizen of this country. I thank each and every one of them.

I am grateful for this incredible document!
In Jesus the Holy Christ,

"Christians have often disputed as to whether what leads the Christian home is good actions, or Faith in Christ. I have no right really to speak on such a difficult question, but it does seem to me like asking which blade in a pair of scissors is most necessary."
-C.S.Lewis in Mere Christianity
I scream for the dead children whose screams are stifled by the word "Choice"!
Mathaytace ><> is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2