[Mark]

Ok, going back to Walkers three at the end of the half. Did you notice how even the Kings reacted? They acted as if it was a perfectly good three. They did not dispute it, and if ANYONE would dispute it, they would be the ones. Yes, on the slow-mo replay, it does show that the shot was late. But the human eye cannot pick up those things. Unless the league adopts instant replay, those kinds of plays will always happen.

Cwebb is good, Christie is good, Divac is good. I never said that they were not ALSO keys to the Kings success in the playoffs, but merely i said that Bibby is who has gotten them through to this point in the playoffs. You saw what happened when Bibby was not able to control the offense in the 4th.

Anyway, i give TONS of credit to the Kings for making this a wonderful series. I mean NO disrespect to the Kings, and hopefully my comments in this particular response show no bias toward the Lakers...

[Art]

Yeah, I remember what happened in the fourth. The Kings realized that they couldn't go to Bibby anymore (after they had already lost their lead) and Webber started making a bunch of shots. A few things went right for the Lakers, one BIG thing went right, and the Lakers won. Kinda.

I know that humans are prone to error. I'm very in favor of instant replay in those situation.

And the Lakers did not deserve to win.

[Mark]

Originally posted by Peja Vu

And the Lakers did not deserve to win.

Thats fine if thats your opinion...but i have to disagree of course!

[thegremmy]

dumb. dumb. dumb. we lost and it was out fault. we wont do it again.

hey that new instant replay rule thing the nba might be cool if they instal it.....might keep some the above happy.....