Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Music & Musicians > Instruments > Guitar
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2011, 02:20 PM   #31
major 4th to a minor 4th
 
telecasting's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2005
Location: England
Posts: 876
That acoustic guitar makes me think: barf. It's possibly the most contentious description of a guitar aesthetic of late but I genuinely think that given that guitar to play, a lot of people may be reluctant due to the looks.

Also, +1 for not liking elixers.

telecasting is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-21-2011, 02:42 PM   #32
PhD candidate
 
to_be_released's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainer. View Post
Taylors have a nice chimey strum on them, but I'd pick a good, deep, resonating classic Martin any day...
When I was looking for an acoustic I was debating over a Tayler and the Martin I eventually bought. I'm so glad I chose the Martin, but I'm also glad I opted for the Fishman soundhole pickup I bought..I find that when I hear people playing acoustic guitars amplified in a live setting it largely sounds percussive, with the notes played taking back seat to the pick noise. In comparison, my Martin+fishman sings out the notes clearly.

I've had more than one person go out and buy the exact same guitar as mine after playing it and deciding it was the best acoustic they'd ever played. And it's one of the cheaper Martin models, a 000X1, with laminate back and sides.
to_be_released is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2011, 05:00 PM   #33
word
Super Moderator
 
Role Modlin's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Ye Olde North State
Posts: 29,934
Send a message via AIM to Role Modlin Send a message via Yahoo to Role Modlin Send a message via Skype™ to Role Modlin
THIS is the guitar I would love to own next. Probably not going to happen...not for a while.

But a guy can dream...can't he?
__________________
blog

I'm Not Who I Was
Role Modlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2011, 06:02 PM   #34
Registered User
 
darfaz's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Bourbonnais, IL
Posts: 262
Interesting comments about the elixir strings. I have always thought they were a selling point for the Taylors. Not because of the brand, but because of their longevity. Most guitars sit on the racks for months, and the elixirs always seem to hold up. I have found the converse to be true for most Martin guitars (yay, a Martin vs. Taylor thread hijack). They always sound dead at the store to me. That was why my first pricey guitar purchase was a Taylor. It just sounded and played so much better at the store than anything else in its price range.
darfaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 02:53 AM   #35
Registered User
 

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 101
Taylors and Martins are good acoustics but I'm too low on the food chain to afford them. I have found that Takamines are pretty decent especially in the electronics department. I haven't played Taylors or martins pushed through an amp but just strumming the strings on a high end martin the sound is heavenly. I don't think recording equipment or amplification does a Martin justice. The high end Talor just plays easily like an electric. awesome comfort. If I could afford a high end acoustic I wouldn't consider either one of them. There are nicer acoustics like Collings, Mcpherson,Santa Cruz and so on. For worship I think that 100 and 200 serise Taylors, plywood Martins, Washburn, Seagull and so on would be acceptable.
daddyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 03:56 AM   #36
Hey, I can change this!!!
 
martinedwards's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Jordanstown, Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by telecasting View Post
That acoustic guitar makes me think: barf. .
careful mate, Mr Wechter might be a member here and get all upset about you opinion of his workmanship and design.
__________________
I build guitars & mandos. Watch the progress below!!

luthier blog

Soundclick Developing Worship forum
martinedwards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 10:51 AM   #37
major 4th to a minor 4th
 
telecasting's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2005
Location: England
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by martinedwards View Post
careful mate, Mr Wechter might be a member here and get all upset about you opinion of his workmanship and design.
Easy fella! Ok, so I'm not a fan of the aesthetic. I'm just about coming round to SG shapes for electrics, but the double cutaway acoustic is beyond the limits of my taste preferences. I'm sure it's well made, but I still don't like it. Call me old fashioned, but I like more classic looking guitars. I'm not even that bigger fan of single cutaway acoustics.
telecasting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 11:02 AM   #38
Constantly growing
 

Joined: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,642
It has always and continues to be my opinion that the sound Taylor's emit is that of a toy, even more so when amplified. I much prefer the Breedloves in that price range.
surferdude9375 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 06:32 PM   #39
Registered User
 

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by surferdude9375 View Post
It has always and continues to be my opinion that the sound Taylor's emit is that of a toy, even more so when amplified. I much prefer the Breedloves in that price range.
Well you are not that educated on what constitutes a good acoustic guitar sound. That is MY opinion.


It may not be to your liking, but to call it sounding like a toy is plain stupid!
mygolfcart123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2011, 06:51 PM   #40
...more machine than man.
 
S.B.Nichols's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 2,623
paid
Easy now, easy....there are many posters here who feel the same as you, and many that don't. Not everyone will agree.

I forgot to mention this. Last week I happened upon this high end guitar shop in town that I had never known existed. They had some R Taylor Guitars. If you don't know what R Taylor is, well, neither did I. Apparently its Taylor's ultra-high end all hand made by the same luither using the best materials and techniques. Absolutely beautiful guitar. Couldn't wait to play it, and after begging the sales man, I did. Had that exact same top-heavy plastic-like quality to it as I hear in their other models. It's juts their niche. Cuts through a mix well I guess. It's just not very warm. Still...for 6 or 7k I'd expect more.

This is the one I played...
R Taylor Style 1 Acoustic Guitar The Guitar Sanctuary | McKinney, Texas | Dallas | macassar ebony
__________________
"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important." - C.S. Lewis

Add me on FaceBook

S.B.Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.