Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Computers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2011, 08:44 AM   #46
Now with Banstick™
Super Moderator
 
Gustin's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 8,143
Send a message via AIM to Gustin Send a message via MSN to Gustin
AT&T's long term plan is LTE. They're using HSPA+ as a stepping stone to get to that point.

Also, 3G phones, while being able to use HSPA+ networks, cannot utilize the speed boost provided by HSPA+. They still run on old 3g speeds.

Gustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-08-2011, 11:34 AM   #47
Honeymoonin'
 
redbaron's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, wa
Posts: 4,932
paid
Send a message via AIM to redbaron
right, but you're looking at 3g, HSPA & HSPA+ supported by the same exact hardware. The current HSPA stuff is really not bad if you can get a very strong signal. A few friends have seen ridiculous speeds... one of 'em sent me this one recently: click for screenshot here's one I took the other day from the basement more screenshot goodness

The difference is that AT&T is only rolling out HSPA+ compatible radios at this point, since it covers all of their 3g & '4G' networks.

2G, 3G, 4G, and everything in between: an Engadget wireless primer -- Engadget

There is some speculation that the HSPA+ networks may actually be able to scale well beyond the 100mbit spec for 4g (which neither LTE or WiMAX can reach at this point either, it should be noted). One of the interesting requirements about being a true 4g, is that it moves all voice traffic to VOIP.

Quote:
This is a pretty big deal to me. It's my only phone. I have no home line. I would like to be able to hear people clearly and be understood well when I am on the phone.
I haven't had a problem with a phone call on any of the big 4 carriers in this regard, outside of the rare experience in the boonies in many, many years. If anything it's more a problem getting a call started, but for the most part, when they connect, it works fine. I will admit that CDMA can sound clearer in really poor reception areas (benefit of the tech). Unfortunately CDMA is an extremely limited tech that the rest of the world has abandoned for a reason...
__________________
-andrew
{insert witty signature}
-->check out my user title!<-- (Oh BTW CLICK ON THAT RED STUFF )
redbaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 11:53 AM   #48
Support Southern Rock
 
normajean777's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,352
Ironically your phones speed test beat out my home wifi which clocked 2.66... My iphone clocked at 2.48 (in Canada of course on Telus).
__________________
We are victims of pop culture.
normajean777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 11:53 AM   #49
Now with Banstick™
Super Moderator
 
Gustin's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 8,143
Send a message via AIM to Gustin Send a message via MSN to Gustin
HSPA phones use HSDPA protocols. They're only capable of "3g" speeds. HSPA+ speeds require new phones. Just like LTE or any other 4G protocols. You said HSPA+ is backwards compatible with HSDPA phones. That's not really true. It's backwards compatible in the sense that you can still use it with your regular bandwidth constraints, but you won't get a speed boost on your HSDPA phone when ATT upgrades the software to HSPA+.

HSPA+ only requires a relatively easy software update which is why they're using it to boost speeds (and advertise a 4g network) until their LTE roll out is ready. Their plan is still to jump on LTE. It's just cheaper to do HSPA+ first.
Gustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 02:28 PM   #50
Honeymoonin'
 
redbaron's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, wa
Posts: 4,932
paid
Send a message via AIM to redbaron
agreed, and I'm not suggesting otherwise, simply pointing out that they don't have to run two side by side networks. As it is right now, both sprint & verizon are in a situation where they have to have 3g to carry voice, even if you're using an LTE/WiMAX handset, due to their data only situation. Hopefully with the true 4g bandwidth starts to be realized, and the VOIP implementation happens, they won't have to do that.
__________________
-andrew
{insert witty signature}
-->check out my user title!<-- (Oh BTW CLICK ON THAT RED STUFF )
redbaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2011, 02:59 PM   #51
Now with Banstick™
Super Moderator
 
Gustin's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Nashville
Posts: 8,143
Send a message via AIM to Gustin Send a message via MSN to Gustin
Yeah, but it's not any different than it will be for AT&T when they start rolling out LTE too. I doubt that voice over HSPA+ will be all that different from 3g. Not that it can't be, it cold be just as good as LTE, but I don't think AT&T will invest much time and money into it since they're not planning on having it around for too long.



My biggest problem with ATT is if I travel outside my area at all, the reception and data coverage gets awful. With Verizon, I drove from Nashville to visit my folks in Tampa and I had (and used) 3G coverage the entire way. There's no way I could do that on AT&T. Even with Verizon rolling out 4G, that 3G coverage doesn't disappear; it means I will get an extra speed boost when I'm in a major city, but I'll still have decent speeds wherever I go.

I'd rather have ok speeds that are reliable and available more places than great speeds that are limited in scope.
Gustin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2011, 06:29 PM   #52
OOOO
 
slap_j's Avatar
 

Joined: Nov 2002
Location: the U.S.
Posts: 20,569
AT&T iPhone beats Verizon in nationwide 3G speed tests - CNN.com
__________________

A d A s t r a P e r A l a s P o r c i
slap_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 04:43 PM   #53
Honeymoonin'
 
redbaron's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, wa
Posts: 4,932
paid
Send a message via AIM to redbaron
Gustin, obviously my phone doesn't support HSPA+ (fastest it supports is HSDPA / HSUPA which is 7.2/5.76mb/s up/down respectively), but the speeds are quite good. I'm not sure why the service is bad in your area (how recently have you tested), but I cruise around in the boonies on my bike all the time and it's rare that I even see 3g, much less Edge service, I'm almost always in an H zone.

slap_j: wonder if they're filtering out all the edge user tests, and only going with the 3g/h tests? I haven't seen an upload under 1.2mb and a download under 1.8mb in a long time, and it's usually significantly faster.

To be fair, it's still slower than my comcast connection at home, but it's considerably more consistent.
__________________
-andrew
{insert witty signature}
-->check out my user title!<-- (Oh BTW CLICK ON THAT RED STUFF )
redbaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2011, 05:20 PM   #54
Art
Cool enough
Administrator
 
Art's Avatar
 

Joined: May 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 39,723
paid
Send a message via AIM to Art Send a message via MSN to Art Send a message via Skype™ to Art
Haha. My Comcast connection at home is consistently above 15 mb/s. I wish my phone could do that.
__________________
Flickr.
Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:50 PM   #55
Honeymoonin'
 
redbaron's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, wa
Posts: 4,932
paid
Send a message via AIM to redbaron
I seriously need to take my cable modem into their office put it on the counter and light it on fire.

I am getting so pissed off at their service when I'm trying to play COD that it's driving me bonkers.
__________________
-andrew
{insert witty signature}
-->check out my user title!<-- (Oh BTW CLICK ON THAT RED STUFF )
redbaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.