[S.B.Nichols]

Originally Posted by JerryLove

But your support is cherry-picked and disproven by coverage of Paris Hilton. Which is and has been my point.

I haven't actually seen you make any points. I've seen you bully other forum members. I've seen you make strawman arguments. I've seen you get confused with what others are telling you. I've seen you make baseless accusations and then scream at others for not posting 'proof', but I've not actually seen you make any points.

By all means, keep trying to bully us, but let's understand what this thread is about before we jump down another one of your rabbit holes. The fact of the matter is that Christians are being targeted in Iraq, and it is largely ignored by the media. Do you have any evidence to the contrary other than a few one-off articles?

[JerryLove]

Originally Posted by S.B.Nichols

The fact of the matter is that Christians are being targeted in Iraq, and it is largely ignored by the media.

I don't disagree with that statement. (by "largely ignored" I mean "gets significantly less press then Tiger Woods infidelities or Sarah Palin's reality show")

I did disagree that it had been completed ignored ("not given air time"), as well as disagreeing with the statement that the reason it has not gotten more attention is because the victims are Christian.

Do you have any evidence to the contrary other than a few one-off articles?

Do I have evidence that disagrees with with something I agree with? No. If I did, I would change my position accordingly.

[S.B.Nichols]

Originally Posted by JerryLove

If you are "shocked" this is getting air time: you've not paid attention.

Originally Posted by JerryLove

I don't disagree with that statement. (by "largely ignored" I mean "gets significantly less press then Tiger Woods infidelities or Sarah Palin's reality show")

I did disagree that it had been completed ignored ("not given air time"), as well as disagreeing with the statement that the reason it has not gotten more attention is because the victims are Christian.

Do I have evidence that disagrees with with something I agree with? No. If I did, I would change my position accordingly. y.

So you've changed your position since your first post in this thread? Fine. It would have been easier on everyone if you would have just stated that for us when it happened instead of leading people around and off track. I'm glad we can put all that behind us now.

[JerryLove]

Originally Posted by S.B.Nichols

So you've changed your position since your first post in this thread? Fine. It would have been easier on everyone if you would have just stated that for us when it happened instead of leading people around and off track. I'm glad we can put all that behind us now.

No, my position is unchanged from my original post. There is no incongruity in the quotes you've used. You may want to consider re-reading.

[adamwagg]

I think we are spent here as we are just restating the same things over and over again!

Also please let's keep our posts civil and friendly as we are starting to veer from that too!