Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet Cite your source that provided you with the info that the cops were in full tactical SWAT gear. |
never said anythign about SWAT gear all i said was Garb
as in the uniform maybe buletproof vest
the shi9nny badge
the gun and the caop ect
one did have a shotgun (atleast)
as it says he was shoot by it
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet 12 feet away? If you can't differentiate between a gun and a hose nozzle from 12 feet out, you're blind. I can cover 12 feet in two steps. I can read small print from 12 feet away. If they were indeed that close, then I call BS on the whole thing. |
you mean a hose nozzle thats amde to look like a gun?
wonder why any one would confuse the two
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet Shawn..... the point is that you need to make sure that you aren't 'making a mistake' before you take actions that will end the life of a human being. |
show can you tell me what acitons they took?
they where there "long enough" is what the investoagtor says
how long is long enough?
five miuitns?
twelve seceonds?
three hours?
they dont say
do you know if they did or dfid not use binoculars to look at the gun?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet Binoculars used from a safe distance could have solved the problem of the cops not knowing what he had. From there, identifying themselves as police officers could have solved the problem of the person not obeying any commands they may or may not have made. (There are conflicting reports on whether or not they actually told him to drop the weapon.) |
can you prove saying "we are the cops" stoepd it?
maybe suyre
but so could not them saying "hey lets dance"
you guys are doingt he samehting you are saying i am doing
i asumme that this guy will shot one of them
you asumme them saying "We all the cops" would have sotped it
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet From there..... you approach the guy and ask what he's up to.
The man had caused no trouble. They did not need to rush. |
poitng a matialc object shaped like a gun is not trouble?
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet The point is that the police had plenty of opportunities to follow policy and do things right, before they shot an innocent and unarmed man. If this man were your family you'd be singing a different tune. |
and if this guy had shoot the cops you would be singign a defrient tunes also
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet So yes, the police need to take responsibility for their incorrect actions, and the consequences of the catastrophic damage they caused. Just because they made a mistake, does not mean that everything is okay. At the very least, they should be charged with manslaughter. |
where did i say evryehting is okay?
dont put words in my mouth
they protected thems elfs form a man who had a gun shap-ed thing in his hands that pointed at them
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet Shawn, from your logic.... it's okay to fire upon someone, if you think they are armed and threatening you. So if I walked by your house, and you pointed at me, and I thought you had a gun.... am I justified in murdering you? The answer is no. |
dose it look like a gun?
if so yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet Like I said earlier...... my request is that the police do their job and contribute to public safety. If someone does not posses the decision making skills to be able to act calmly and with restraint in situations of potential danger, they have no business being a police officer. |
a polices fociser first bussines is to get home to his wife and kids
if that had been a real gun
whaty woudl you sya?