Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterDominator I view medicare more as a government service that is taxed for now and possibly accessed later in life if necessary, much like social security. whereas this is mandating that someone purchase a product from a private company now, or else face some sort of penalty. on that level, at least, they appear very different. |
Medicare penalizes you for not having medicare (charges a tax) and then buys health insurance for you (buys medicare, but only if you are old enough)
UHC lets you avoid the UHC tax by choosing your own healthcare and buying it for yourself.
We could just tax and assign healthcare, making it just like medicare; except that we didn't want to end employer-sponsored healthcare (and that would).
I'm sorry. There's no real difference. Both are mandates. If anything: medicare is the worse of the two.
Quote:
|
also, if you don't have an income, you don't put money into medicare or social security - at least giving individuals some level of choice. don't want to be taxed? don't work.
|
People with no income are not charged for healthcare under UHC either.