Quote:
|
So you're telling me these actually more low end than a standard tele? That seems weird to me. What string size are you using on your standard teles and were they american pups or not?
|
Yes - a bit woofier tone than an alder body tele. No they are not american made pickups, but, they are made to classic tele specs - real alnico polepiece magnets, not the ceramic bar underneath steel polepieces like most budget priced imports (don't MIM's also have those type?), and a steel baseplate, not brass. They even went so far as to copper plate the baseplate, use fiber bobbins, and wrap the coil of the bridge pickup with black cord. I guess like vintage tele's had. No excessive microphonics. Nice, clear, strat-like neck pickup tone, not the common muddy sounding variety. They sound great, and IMO are every bit as good as what would come in a Fender american standard, no need to change them unless you wanted high output or humbucker types.
As far as the weight, I actually prefer mine to be a little heavier; I like the inertia of a guitar that's around 7.5 pounds minimum (although not heavier than 9.5 ). I find that ultra light guitars wear out my left arm playing muscles faster, although that's not a major concern for playing 4 or 5 songs at church. I think next time I change my strings, I'm going to put some extra weight inside the control cavity area, like 1 or 2 rolls of pennies.
I use 10 - 46 gauge on mine.
I compared a 50's CV tele to 3 or 4 MIM teles at a music store a few months back; IMO, the CV was better all round than any ot the MIM's. I particularly do not like how every MIM tele I pick up has the strings too close to the edge of the fretboard, like the bridge saddle spacing is just a bit too wide - there's no excuse for that, Fender.