Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Hobbies & Interests > Cars
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2010, 03:35 PM   #16
recovering user
 

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
As for me.....

Daily car: E90 M3
Rally/snow car: Evo IX
Fun weekend car/track rat: Exige S 260
Ubercar: Here I'm torn between a 911 GT3RS, or a built 911 Turbo. The GT3 would be awesome, but maybe belongs on my list where the Lotus currently is...... The Exige is too awesome to bump, though. The Turbo is appealing due to the possibility of an easy 700+ horses and AWD....

Although for just a track machine, it would be hard to beat an Atom with the V8 that Andrew mentioned.... or perhaps the Caterham Levante. Heck, even just a factory Caterham R500 would be awesome. I fear the Levante is overkill to the point of uselessness.

mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-13-2010, 06:00 PM   #17
Exiled user
 
scared2mosh's Avatar
 

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet View Post
Because it's doubtful that anything over 3L will rev to the 12k rpm he specified....
True... if only it wasn't so
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinclair Lewis
"Fascism will come wrapped in a flag and carrying a Bible."
scared2mosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 10:29 AM   #18
recovering user
 

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by scared2mosh View Post
True... if only it wasn't so
Eh.... not really a big loss. A few years back, the F1 cars with the 3.0 V10's threw out close to 900 horses...

Displacement is over-rated.
mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 10:35 AM   #19
Psalms 137:9
 
mattslope's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Below me.
Posts: 6,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet View Post
Eh.... not really a big loss. A few years back, the F1 cars with the 3.0 V10's threw out close to 900 horses...

Displacement is over-rated.
What he said.
mattslope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 10:42 AM   #20
recovering user
 

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Quite. In fact, the older Lotus F1 cars put out between 1200-1300 horses from a 1.5 liter motor.... and that was back in the mid '80's.

Smaller cylinders are more efficient.... generally. There's a reason that Porsche went to a dual spark-plug design with the 993 back in the early '90's.

I bet if you drilled another hole and ran dual plugs in an engine like the 7.0 Z06..... you'd probably see gains of at least 10-15%.

And that's a pretty cheap mod, too. Not cheap if you screw it up, though.
mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 10:43 AM   #21
It's over 9000!!!!!!!
 
Tim Possible's Avatar
 

Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Reno 911.
Posts: 9,543
Send a message via AIM to Tim Possible Send a message via MSN to Tim Possible
Quote:
Originally Posted by scared2mosh View Post
What would be the components of your dream car? (try to keep it at least somewhat realistic)

.....................



Large displacement.
Manual transmission.
Nice exhaust system.



Done.
Tim Possible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 11:34 AM   #22
Exiled user
 
scared2mosh's Avatar
 

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phantom Mullet View Post
Quite. In fact, the older Lotus F1 cars put out between 1200-1300 horses from a 1.5 liter motor.... and that was back in the mid '80's.

Smaller cylinders are more efficient.... generally. There's a reason that Porsche went to a dual spark-plug design with the 993 back in the early '90's.

I bet if you drilled another hole and ran dual plugs in an engine like the 7.0 Z06..... you'd probably see gains of at least 10-15%.

And that's a pretty cheap mod, too. Not cheap if you screw it up, though.
So basically it's only a good idea if you are Hennessy or Leno? While you are at it ya might as well buikd it up so it revs higher (I think HPE actually does this).

Also I'd like high reving gas performance version of my dream car. kthnxbi
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinclair Lewis
"Fascism will come wrapped in a flag and carrying a Bible."
scared2mosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2010, 11:46 AM   #23
recovering user
 

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by scared2mosh View Post
So basically it's only a good idea if you are Hennessy or Leno? While you are at it ya might as well buikd it up so it revs higher (I think HPE actually does this).
Nah, A set of stock heads can't be that expensive. Well, unless GM is in the business of raping everyone on replacement parts... Which I don't know. I've never tried to buy Corvette parts. If I had a ton of money, it would be a fun experiment.

I'm not sure making that motor spin faster would net you any real advantage. I mean, you could probably just raise the rev limit a bit and hope it doesn't blow up, but there wouldn't be much point in that. A cam could make it a bit more peaky, but again, your gains would be negligible. Also, spinning it faster would need to be accompanied by a gearing change if you were to try to actually get any results from it.
mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 01:39 AM   #24
Registered User
 
jameshall's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 19
I like muscle cars myself!
jameshall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 08:44 AM   #25
Administrator
Administrator
 
Pauler's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,725
paid
any preference in muscle cars?...are you a mopar guy, ford, chevy?
__________________
We are none of us infallible--not even the youngest of us.
- WH Thompson
Pauler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:05 AM   #26
word
Super Moderator
 
Role Modlin's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Ye Olde North State
Posts: 29,934
Send a message via AIM to Role Modlin Send a message via Yahoo to Role Modlin Send a message via Skype™ to Role Modlin
Here are my two dream cars.
Attached Thumbnails
911carrera4.jpg   hartler.gif  
__________________
blog

I'm Not Who I Was
Role Modlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:10 AM   #27
Heaven isn't too far away
 
gtrdave's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Location: The First State
Posts: 6,197
Send a message via AIM to gtrdave
Quote:
Originally Posted by jameshall View Post
I like muscle cars myself!
Me too, and if I had to pick a "dream car" from the lot of '60s/'70s muscle cars, I'd go with a '70 Plymouth AAR 'cuda.
It had the look, it had the performance, it had a dash of practicality...it's an all-around performer, imho.

If I open up my choice of dream car from outside the lot of muscle cars, I'd go with some more modern form of Porsche 911.
Attached Thumbnails
plymouth-cuda-aar.jpg   2009-porsche-911-carrera.jpg  
__________________
Lead, follow and get out of the way.

youtube
facebook
cd baby
gtrdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:11 AM   #28
word
Super Moderator
 
Role Modlin's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Ye Olde North State
Posts: 29,934
Send a message via AIM to Role Modlin Send a message via Yahoo to Role Modlin Send a message via Skype™ to Role Modlin
I do have one more but it's just for the coolness factor and nothing else.
Attached Thumbnails
christine.jpg  
__________________
blog

I'm Not Who I Was
Role Modlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.