| Welcome to the Christian Guitar Forum. | Welcome to Christian Guitar, the world's largest Christian guitar resource and forum community where over 150,000 Christian music fans from around the world come to discuss all Christian music, living the Christian life, current events, etc. in over 3,000,000 posted discussions!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our FREE community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), blog about your Christian journey, suggest and share guitar tabs, see LESS forum advertisements, upload photos in your own photo album and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
11-06-2009, 07:04 PM
|
#16 | | Squidlipsistan Administrator
Joined: Jun 2001 Location: OC Posts: 31,719
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrdave From what I remember. The Nighthawk, Blueshawk and The Hawk were all sub-$1000 w/ The Hawk being close to $500 or so, as the stripped-down Studioesque model.
They also used to have the slanted pickups and blade-type selector switch.
The new one looks like a baby Les Paul. Maybe that's intentional... | To me, that does not look like a nighthawk. I would be interested in a real one. |
| |
11-06-2009, 07:17 PM
|
#17 | | dad
Joined: Apr 2001 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 19,694
| I think dimensionally it may be identical to the older Nighthawks, but with all the hardware changes it loses the flavor of the original:
__________________ PS: there's a button called "multi-quote" that allows you to quote several thing in one post instead of making a new post for each thing you quote. It really helps keep the forums running smoothly
We've all got ideas. We are the music makers. We make money to buy things, and write down words.
Check out my new band, The Morning Glass. |
| |
11-06-2009, 07:21 PM
|
#18 | | Squidlipsistan Administrator
Joined: Jun 2001 Location: OC Posts: 31,719
| Quote:
Originally Posted by thesteve I think dimensionally it may be identical to the older Nighthawks, but with all the hardware changes it loses the flavor of the original:  | Yeah, and I want the funkiness, although... I prefer the 3 pickup version. |
| |
11-07-2009, 01:53 AM
|
#19 | | Thread Killer
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Saskatchewan, Canada Posts: 4,277
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrdave Nah. The SG secured that title back in 1961 and has kept a stranglehold on it ever since...
I guess for what the new 'hawk comes with, the $1600 price seems on par with Gibson's pricing: AAA top, bound contoured body, nitro finish, Kluson tuners, P90/Bb3 combo and a hard shell case. This is no "Faded" series guitar. | SG's are one of my favorite looking guitars. I don't think I want to see your guitar collection anymore . . .
__________________ "If you're reading this, I'm assuming you didn't dodge a bomb today, didn't hear a low rumble of fighter jets over the horizon, didn't starve again today, slept in a bed last night and you probably have clothes to wear too. Remember that many people on Earth were not so fortunate today, and that with all the negativity, war, poverty, bigotry, death and destruction in the world, it is the duty of us with moderate priveladge to make the most of our days and live responsibly and lovingly so that all the aforementioned isn't in vain as it far too often is."
~Chicken, from Dead To Me |
| |
11-07-2009, 07:13 AM
|
#20 | | Registered User
Joined: Aug 2008 Location: Gainesville, Florida Posts: 92
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Ax That would imply Gibson has good looking guitars in the first place. |
By all means, enlighten us with the guitars you consider to be better looking than Gibsons.
__________________ |
| |
11-07-2009, 07:46 AM
|
#21 | | Moving right along...
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: The First State Posts: 4,686
| Quote:
Originally Posted by earlessdog SG's are one of my favorite looking guitars. I don't think I want to see your guitar collection anymore . . . | There are no SGs in it, I can assure you of that.
I wish I could explain to you why I dislike the SG body shape so much, but I really have no idea. It is something that I've held since I was a kid. Even my biggest early influence, Gary Rossington, played an SG for some of his slide guitar parts, but I remembering not caring for the look of that guitar at all. I've even played a few and while they've played nice and sounded cool, holding the thing was like holding an ugly baby.
Now we return you back to your regularly scheduled thread... |
| |
11-07-2009, 01:20 PM
|
#22 | | is a straight up Rainer.
Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Seattle, WA. Posts: 20,165
| Plus, SGs are uber-neck-heavy.
..........and really ugly. |
| |
11-07-2009, 05:55 PM
|
#23 | | rocks
Joined: Jan 2004 Location: Semi-Nomadic. Canada tho. Posts: 4,872
| Trooooll toll....
what you say?
troll toll...
*ahem* anyway. Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq Yeah, and I want the funkiness, although... I prefer the 3 pickup version.  | Oooh yeah...that's a guitar I could see myself getting behind.
__________________ Chaotic evil means never having to say sorry. |
| |
11-08-2009, 06:24 PM
|
#24 | | Registered User
Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Northern VA Posts: 559
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gtrdave I wish I could explain to you why I dislike the SG body shape so much, but I really have no idea. It is something that I've held since I was a kid. Even my biggest early influence, Gary Rossington, played an SG for some of his slide guitar parts, but I remembering not caring for the look of that guitar at all. I've even played a few and while they've played nice and sounded cool, holding the thing was like holding an ugly baby.  | Maybe Les Paul was a blood relative of yours  .
__________________ Do all things without murmurings and disputings:
That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world; |
| |
11-08-2009, 07:54 PM
|
#25 | | Moving right along...
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: The First State Posts: 4,686
| Quote:
Originally Posted by funkStrat_97 Maybe Les Paul was a blood relative of yours  . | Doubtful. Seymour Duncan, maybe... |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM. |