Quote:
Originally Posted by nolidad First it is not $3/week- it is $30 which is why Wal mart and all the other corporations that import from China have helped create a middle class in China where one never existed.
And the average work week in Chinese factories is 60, not 72 hours which is normal for that culture. So they are working the same- but are now middle class in that country. |
Wait, I can make up numbers to make my point sound better too! Ready? Well, it's actually only $1 a week and the hours are closer to 96 a week.
Sources?
Also, you are saying that living off of $3 a week in a government dormitory sharing a room with 9 other people is middle class!?! Based on what measure?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolidad Do you have a problem with sports stars making $25 million a year while the hot dog vendors mak $8/ hour?
How about movie stars grabbing $10-15 mil a film while the theater employess make $8-9/hour? I have never seen outrage at these. |
Why are you trying to skirt the question by asking me non-related questions. I don't remember sports or film being a topic of conversation in this thread. I believe we were talking about Wal-Mart. So, in keeping on topic, what do you think about what I originally said?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolidad Well Wal Mart is doing something right- every where they go- they succeed. |
Yeah, and everywhere they go they get sued for violating child labor laws, disability act laws, fair wages, employee rights, sex discrimination etc... But hey, they're making a profit so who cares about human rights eh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolidad I am sorry but going to Walmart and paying $3.99 for a pair of fruit of th eloom boxers is not sin because I won't go to Mom and Pops clothiers and pay $5.99 for the same item. |
And you can feel good about knowing that somewhere in the world a poor woman is sitting in a shack without water with 15 cents in her hand so that Wal-Mart could save you $2. Feel good?