CLICK HERE AND JOIN CHRISTIAN GUITAR TODAY!
Welcome to the Christian Guitar Forum.
Welcome to Christian Guitar, the world's largest Christian guitar resource and forum community where over 150,000 Christian music fans from around the world come to discuss all Christian music, living the Christian life, current events, etc. in over 3,000,000 posted discussions!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our FREE community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), blog about your Christian journey, suggest and share guitar tabs, see LESS forum advertisements, upload photos in your own photo album and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.


Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Government & Economics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2009, 09:13 PM   #61
Real candidate of change
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 15,734
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeful View Post
I might actually agree with your assumption that the government can regulate better, IF you can guarantee the politicians will not mess it up or interfere with the intent of the law. Just for clarification, the banks did not lend to the quasi-government agencies. They put gasoline on the fire by buying the loans that the banks would not normally make because of the looser underwriting guidelines.
Which would mean that a collapse in the housing market would trigger the death of these quasi-government agencies... not the banks or stock market, neither of which would hold these debt-backed securities.

Of course, that's not what happened. These mortgages got packaged and sold in the private market (the stock exchange), and these debt backed securities were bought heavily by banks (AIG, Chase, Citi, etc).

So the appraisers did not self-regulate and put bogus appraisals. The mortgage companies did not self-regulate, and wrote horrible mortgages. The banks did not self-regulate and packaged these, and almost no-one self regulated and everyone bought the securities.

Finally: No one has told me how Frosted Flakes is a "healthy choice".

JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 09-28-2009, 10:15 AM   #62
Fuzzy meets Joe Walsh!
 
Hopeful's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 4,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove View Post
Which would mean that a collapse in the housing market would trigger the death of these quasi-government agencies... not the banks or stock market, neither of which would hold these debt-backed securities.

Of course, that's not what happened. These mortgages got packaged and sold in the private market (the stock exchange), and these debt backed securities were bought heavily by banks (AIG, Chase, Citi, etc).

So the appraisers did not self-regulate and put bogus appraisals. The mortgage companies did not self-regulate, and wrote horrible mortgages. The banks did not self-regulate and packaged these, and almost no-one self regulated and everyone bought the securities.

Finally: No one has told me how Frosted Flakes is a "healthy choice".
Well, the jury is still out on whether or not we've seen the last of the residential mortgage problems. Even the "A" rated traunches are experiencing delinquencies and even downgrades. This means that there are further developments in the future. The impact on Fannie and Freddie has not fully been discovered (or maybe not disclosed).

I already answered you on your "Sugar Smacks" question, but I would say the same for Frosted Flakes.
__________________
I've been humbled many times, but always for my own good!

Check this guy out:
http://www.dougdoppler.com/
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:11 AM   #63
Fabulous!
 
Bryan's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 14,915
paid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove View Post
Of course, that's not what happened. These mortgages got packaged and sold in the private market (the stock exchange), and these debt backed securities were bought heavily by banks (AIG, Chase, Citi, etc).
While I understand the point you are making, I have to correct you here. CDOs are not traded on the stock exchange. You have to be a qualified institutional buyer or an accredited investor to buy them. It is extremely rare for John Q Public to be able to buy these (he has to be rich...).
Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:19 AM   #64
Fuzzy meets Joe Walsh!
 
Hopeful's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 4,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
While I understand the point you are making, I have to correct you here. CDOs are not traded on the stock exchange. You have to be a qualified institutional buyer or an accredited investor to buy them. It is extremely rare for John Q Public to be able to buy these (he has to be rich...).
And in addition to CDOs, MBS for residential mortgages...
__________________
I've been humbled many times, but always for my own good!

Check this guy out:
http://www.dougdoppler.com/
Hopeful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 06:14 AM   #65
Real candidate of change
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 15,734
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
While I understand the point you are making, I have to correct you here. CDOs are not traded on the stock exchange. You have to be a qualified institutional buyer or an accredited investor to buy them. It is extremely rare for John Q Public to be able to buy these (he has to be rich...).
And then that institutional buyer sells its stock.

One part of the issue is that loans were sold, then securities were sold against the value of those loans, then securities were sold against the values of those securities. Meanwhile there was insurance on the mortgages, and that insurance was sold, and resold as well.

There's certainly no rational way to argue that the failure with MBSs didn't effect Joe Citizen.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 06:14 AM   #66
Real candidate of change
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 15,734
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopeful View Post
I already answered you on your "Sugar Smacks" question, but I would say the same for Frosted Flakes.
Did you? apologies. I'll have to go find it.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 09:26 AM   #67
Fabulous!
 
Bryan's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 14,915
paid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove View Post
There's certainly no rational way to argue that the failure with MBSs didn't effect Joe Citizen.
I never made such an argument.
Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.