| One of the major problems with GM is and always was their stone-age way of selling cars. They just stretch themselves thin, selling cars across their brands that are literally the same car, but re badged, therefore competing against each other. It is sad as I am a huge car fan, but they really needed to get rid of some makes and streamline and focus the company more (why pay more for the extra marketing, R&D, management, etc costs associated with more brands when they sell the same cars?). Getting rid of Pontiac, Saab, and eventually Saturn will be good moves, and will focus the company more. In fact, I would argue scrapping Buick and focusing on Chevy, GMC, Cadillac in the US and their other overseas brands (Holden, Vauxhaul, etc).
You are right, government ownership of GM is ludicrous. The government would have been better suited not taking a financial stake in GM and leaving it to the shareholders to do this. Chapter 11 corporations restructure all the time without government help, and I don't understand what the government would do differently that necessitates them buying GM. At least if GM tanked, it would have just been shareholder money going down the tube rather than taxpayer (ahem, mint-printed money) going down the tube. GM has had the power to properly restructure their company all along, they just needed their current financial state to be the reality check to do it.
People don't buy Chevrolet young, then later Pontiac, then later Olds, then later Buick, then finally Caddy in old age like they did back in the good ole' days.
__________________ In Him,
Phil |