|
View Poll Results: Is an engaged woman (or man) fair game? | |
Yes
|    | 4 | 8.00% | |
No
|    | 42 | 84.00% | |
Depends
|    | 4 | 8.00% |
05-13-2009, 05:16 PM
|
#1 | | Silent One
Joined: Sep 2001 Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,115
| Is an engaged woman (or man) fair game? Simple question. Yes, no, or does it depend on the situation?
Some background particular to this situation: - Both the pursuer and the pursued are devout Christians.
- Both parties have known each other for many years.
__________________ Is faith logical?
Last edited by Novan_Leon; 05-13-2009 at 05:20 PM.
Reason: Formatting
|
| |
05-13-2009, 05:31 PM
|
#2 | | Registered User
Joined: May 2009 Location: Minnesota Posts: 315
| you mean can you ask her on a date or something like that?
I would say no, thats a huge disrespect to the man and I think it's pretty low |
| |
05-13-2009, 05:36 PM
|
#3 | | stop looking at me.
Joined: Feb 2009 Location: The CPF Posts: 393
| ^ I'm with Brett |
| |
05-13-2009, 05:37 PM
|
#4 | | Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 367
| I would say no way. Unless you have a really strong belief God's got some hand in this and you've prayed with other people and they've confirmed that (if God did decide to do that) then that seems pretty... cheap. The person's already said they've committed the rest of their life to someone else. That's not the time to try to change their mind, not at all. |
| |
05-13-2009, 08:16 PM
|
#5 | | retired from CGR. :)
Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 7,413
| No.
__________________ The artist formerly known as gg7 has moved on to where God has taken him, and is still traveling that road at the time of this message. |
| |
05-13-2009, 08:37 PM
|
#6 | | Enginerd
Joined: Aug 2006 Posts: 1,188
| Nope.
__________________ -- guitarman531
_______________________________ |
| |
05-13-2009, 08:59 PM
|
#7 | | so much
Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 21,067
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Novan_Leon Simple question. Yes, no, or does it depend on the situation?
Some background particular to this situation: - Both the pursuer and the pursued are devout Christians.
- Both parties have known each other for many years.
| Try this: Ask her fiance.
Presumably, if she were interested in pursuing another relationship, she would not be engaged. If she is still engaged and interested / looking to pursue a relationship with someone other than her betrothed, she's not the type of woman you should want to be involved with, I don't think.
__________________ 
"(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or
recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage. Texas Constitution, Article I, Section 32" |
| |
05-13-2009, 09:16 PM
|
#8 | | is still learning...
Joined: Apr 2006 Location: The Heartland Posts: 1,072
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate Try this: Ask her fiance.
Presumably, if she were interested in pursuing another relationship, she would not be engaged. If she is still engaged and interested / looking to pursue a relationship with someone other than her betrothed, she's not the type of woman you should want to be involved with, I don't think. | Exactly.
A betrothal is already a commitment and the marriage ceremony caps the process. If someone is engaged, they are off limits. |
| |
05-13-2009, 10:06 PM
|
#9 | | Moderator | Engaged literally means involved with/in...so I'd agree with everyone else and say no.
__________________ This is what I brought you, this you can keep; this is what I brought, you may forget me. I promise to depart just promise one thing; kiss my eyes and lay me to sleep. |
| |
05-13-2009, 10:39 PM
|
#10 | | FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 2,732
| I happen to disagree with everyone else. It depends. If a woman is engaged, and is having second thoughts, and is in a position where she would even think about breaking it off, then yes, she is fair game. If everything is going along great, and she is completely committed to her fiance, then I think it would be lame to try to wreck everything.
But the bottom line is this: they aren't married. They are both fair game.
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by Josey Wales THEN YOU KICK HER IN THE &%*(^*% FACE WITH YOUR ENERGY LEGS... DUH. | |
| |
05-13-2009, 10:41 PM
|
#11 | | Moderator | Quote:
Originally Posted by Napoleon17 I happen to disagree with everyone else. It depends. If a woman is engaged, and is having second thoughts, and is in a position where she would even think about breaking it off, then yes, she is fair game. If everything is going along great, and she is completely committed to her fiance, then I think it would be lame to try to wreck everything. | Shouldn't she break it off first, though?
__________________ This is what I brought you, this you can keep; this is what I brought, you may forget me. I promise to depart just promise one thing; kiss my eyes and lay me to sleep. |
| |
05-13-2009, 10:42 PM
|
#12 | | FUN FUN FUN FUN FUN
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: FLORIDA Posts: 2,732
| Quote:
Originally Posted by RK_lover Shouldn't she break it off first, though? |
Yes, of course. Why wouldn't she? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Nate Presumably, if she were interested in pursuing another relationship, she would not be engaged. If she is still engaged and interested / looking to pursue a relationship with someone other than her betrothed, she's not the type of woman you should want to be involved with, I don't think. | True, although she could have second thoughts. The engagement period is often the hardest time for a couple (up to that point), and it can cause a person to reconsider. Engagement is a commitment to get married someday. People can definitely change their mind about that, and it's better to change your mind before marriage, than after you've tied the knot. That being said, if a woman is completely committed to the idea of marrying her fiance, then it would be lame to try to make her unlove that person so she can love you.
__________________ Quote: |
Originally Posted by Josey Wales THEN YOU KICK HER IN THE &%*(^*% FACE WITH YOUR ENERGY LEGS... DUH. | |
| |
05-13-2009, 10:45 PM
|
#13 | | Is only human.
Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Houston, Tx Posts: 8,829
| Quote:
Originally Posted by TunerSteve Exactly.
A betrothal is already a commitment and the marriage ceremony caps the process. If someone is engaged, they are off limits. | This post is pretty close to reflecting my own thoughts on the matter.
When someone is engaged, I would say they are taken/spoken for. And trying to move in on him/her is definately a no no.
__________________ Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate It's indisputable, though, that it has absolutely nothing to do with either copulation or defecation. | Quote:
Originally Posted by slap_j Man-boobs of steel! | |
| |
05-13-2009, 11:03 PM
|
#14 | | WELL FOR WILLING PARTY
Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Winston-Salem, NC Posts: 2,287
| No. |
| |
05-13-2009, 11:18 PM
|
#15 | | Legen, wait for it...
Joined: Nov 2004 Location: MacLaren's Pub Posts: 9,922
| Umm... no. Absolutely not. Maybe you're missing a point here... she said she would MARRY this guy, as in "Forsaking all others"... "Til death do us part"...
__________________ dary! Current Rig:
Guitars: The NightShade, Ibanez Artcore AG-85, Rogue ST-4 (and not ashamed of it)
Pedals: Dunlop Crybaby -> BYOC Lazy Sprocket -> SBN Soviet Power Booster -> SBN Modded Ibanez TS7 Tube Screamer -> Danelectro Cool Cat Fuzz -> SBN Discombobulamodulator -> Modded EHX Nano Small Clone -> Korg Pitchblack Tuner.
Amps: Vox Night Train, B52 AT-100
Cabs: Peavey 412 Slanted Cab and B52 AT-100 Combo Cab (sometimes connected to the Night Train). |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:07 PM. |