Quote:
Originally Posted by mulletman Firstly, no theory of evolution I'm familiar with states that some sort of outside genetic trait must be introduced into the offspring. Secondly, have you ever heard of a 'genetic mutation?' |
yes. it is almost always a bad thing and doesn't happen via random processes the way it is thought to be in the unconfermed hypothesis of evolution.it can always be explaned through true scientific processes and genetics.like drug resistant bacteria.they don't have anything new but rather they lost what was needed to control the amount of Penecilanace the produce. kinda like a human on PCP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akshay Okay let say for a moment that you are right. How do humans have such genetic mutation if they all descended from Adam and Eve. If there are only two possibilities for every gene then humans shouldn't have the wide diversity of skin color, height, eye color, hair color, etc. |
ummm. all humans are the exact same color. melenin.there are only different shades of it and it is a recesive trait to have a small amount of it (i.e. white skin).please don't try to argue genetics unless you trully know what you are talking about.
Quote:
|
The reason there is such diversity in our phenotypes (our external appearance) is due to genetic mutations within our DNA. This is true whether you believe in Evolution or not. Now what evolution says is that the buildup of the genetic mutations can cause speciation.
|
not mutation but rather addaptation.notice that darker people live in sunnier parts of the world where their dark skin helps protect them from the sun.see because of mutualistic relationships the idea of evolution is highly unlikely.two organisms would have had to evolve at the exact same time for them to have the relationship they have today. also their are certain things that wouldn't survive the transition.also we have no examples of any transitional forms to prove this speciation. all that has bin done is lots of guessing. they don't know that mutation can cause speciation. it has never bin proven but however most of nature suggests that it didn't and can't do the the facts I just stated.
Quote:
|
So as i said earlier Genetics doesn't disagree with Evolution, it is absolutely necessary for evolution.
|
ok what you said here makes no sense. please tell me sir. how can a Q gene enter the genotype sequence that I presented?unless you can explain the "mutation" through actual scientific processes, we can judge out that evolution is as much (if not more so) guessology as creation is.