Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Government & Economics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2008, 11:59 AM   #1
Registered User
 
darfaz's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Bourbonnais, IL
Posts: 247
Pickens Plan

Former oil man Boone Pickens' energy plan is gaining some attention in the media. Here is a summary of his plan.

http://www.pickensplan.com/theplan/

Basically he wants to reduce dependence on foreign oil by utilizing the winds of the Great Plains to generate electricy and switch natural gas from being a fuel used to generate electricity to transportation. Seems like an interesting idea, although I'm not sure how long it would take to have a large percentage of people to move to nat gas in their vehicles.

darfaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 07-10-2008, 01:20 PM   #2
...more machine than man.
 
S.B.Nichols's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2005
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 2,588
paid
It's an ambitious plan that I'm starting to like more and more the more I read into it.

It's not the people he has to convince to make the switch to nat gas, its the car companies.

I was a bit concerned at first that he was in it for money (I grew up in West Texas and he is well known in those parts as a nat gas man), but then I learned hes throwing millions of his own money into phase 1 of his plan without any real way to recoup.
__________________
"Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance. The only thing it cannot be is moderately important." - C.S. Lewis

Add me on FaceBook

S.B.Nichols is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 01:42 PM   #3
Registered User
 
RelientKFan7's Avatar
 

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 306
Interesting...
RelientKFan7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 02:25 PM   #4
Needs All Season tires!
 
LaserRacer's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 202
I still think that the United States is missing the ball...the majority of Europe has the right idea with its use of nuclear energy. Unfortunately the American people have villified nuclear energy simply because many people don't understand it.
__________________
Me fail English...Thats unpossible.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Te eF Kay View Post
Mulletboy didn't say you were a/s/l, he asked if I thought he was an a/s/l.
That's what I thought of it anyway.
LaserRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 04:27 PM   #5
Registered User
 
darfaz's Avatar
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Location: Bourbonnais, IL
Posts: 247
The plan that Pickens has outlined does not address nuclear power as far as I can tell. I think the problem he may have (purely speculative) with increasing nuclear power is the time it takes to authorize and construct new plants. I think 8 years is the minimum from proposal to completion. With his outline it looks like wind power can be on the grid pretty quickly.

Something else interesting is that he himself has constructed a wind farm on his property (as stated above) . He seems to be fully invested in wind which could be problematic in that it is self-serving. Or it could be that he is placing his money where his plan is.
darfaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 05:12 PM   #6
Fabulous!
 
Bryan's Avatar
 

Joined: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,816
paid
Send a message via Yahoo to Bryan Send a message via Skype™ to Bryan
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserRacer View Post
I still think that the United States is missing the ball...the majority of Europe has the right idea with its use of nuclear energy. Unfortunately the American people have villified nuclear energy simply because many people don't understand it.
that and the NIMBY factor
__________________
It's Time
Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 05:22 PM   #7
Laborer/Philosopher
 
Chrysostom's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserRacer View Post
I still think that the United States is missing the ball...the majority of Europe has the right idea with its use of nuclear energy. Unfortunately the American people have villified nuclear energy simply because many people don't understand it.
Isn't John McCain a nuclear fan?

At least somebody is...
__________________
Peace,
John

CGR
Wordpress
Chrysostom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 05:25 PM   #8
Real candidate of change
 
JerryLove's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,259
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserRacer View Post
I still think that the United States is missing the ball...the majority of Europe has the right idea with its use of nuclear energy. Unfortunately the American people have villified nuclear energy simply because many people don't understand it.
Europe is heavily into several sources of energy. Including nuclear. Including wind.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 05:26 PM   #9
OOOO
 
slap_j's Avatar
 

Joined: Nov 2002
Location: the U.S.
Posts: 20,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysostom View Post
Isn't John McCain a nuclear fan?
He's pro-whale blubber.
__________________

A d A s t r a P e r A l a s P o r c i
slap_j is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 06:11 PM   #10
Laborer/Philosopher
 
Chrysostom's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 17,037
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove View Post
Europe is heavily into several sources of energy. Including nuclear. Including wind.
And their gas is unbelievably expensive.

Probably because they use the metric system. Everything gets messed up when your units of measurement are conducive to arithmetic.

How many ounces in a pint again?
__________________
Peace,
John

CGR
Wordpress
Chrysostom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 06:34 PM   #11
Fabulous!
 
Bryan's Avatar
 

Joined: Oct 2001
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 15,816
paid
Send a message via Yahoo to Bryan Send a message via Skype™ to Bryan
16
__________________
It's Time
Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2008, 11:19 PM   #12
Needs All Season tires!
 
LaserRacer's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2008
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
that and the NIMBY factor
I understand that...but I would much rather have a nuclear powerplant in my backyard than a coal or oil powerplant.

The problem I see with wind power is the number of windmills necessary to produce a given amount of power. I just takes up way too much space.
__________________
Me fail English...Thats unpossible.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Te eF Kay View Post
Mulletboy didn't say you were a/s/l, he asked if I thought he was an a/s/l.
That's what I thought of it anyway.
LaserRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2008, 01:41 PM   #13
recovering user
 

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserRacer View Post
I just takes up way too much space.
Yeah. Gosh. Stay in your own room.
mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 01:16 AM   #14
Support Southern Rock
 
normajean777's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Republic of Alberta
Posts: 2,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.B.Nichols View Post
It's an ambitious plan that I'm starting to like more and more the more I read into it.

It's not the people he has to convince to make the switch to nat gas, its the car companies.

I was a bit concerned at first that he was in it for money (I grew up in West Texas and he is well known in those parts as a nat gas man), but then I learned hes throwing millions of his own money into phase 1 of his plan without any real way to recoup.
Would he care at all if he wasn't in it for the money?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysostom View Post
And their gas is unbelievably expensive.

Probably because they use the metric system. Everything gets messed up when your units of measurement are conducive to arithmetic.

How many ounces in a pint again?
Haha I'm not totally sure, but its mainly taxes. Canadians pay more than Americans, and Europeans have always paid more than Canadians. Weird hey? You guys have like the cheapest gas of all developed countries. (Yet we have all the fossil fuels).


BTW I would that Obama wants to cut out America's usage of dirty oil. That is oil from Alberta Oil Sands. So basically he wants to stop getting oil from a secure place, Alberta, who is the single largest supplier of oil to America, and replace it with what? Middle East oil? Wind? Who knows?
__________________
We are victims of pop culture.
normajean777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2008, 01:26 AM   #15
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaserRacer View Post
I still think that the United States is missing the ball...the majority of Europe has the right idea with its use of nuclear energy. Unfortunately the American people have villified nuclear energy simply because many people don't understand it.
Europe has the right idea by sticking wind generators and whatever other alternatives they come up with anywhere they can. The United States is backwards and idiotic in their approach to energy, and one day we're going to pay for it when the oil wells run dry.
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 PM.