Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove So some people's votes count more than others.
Why "ought" you to have more political power than a citizen in a city? | Yeah... there's a small disproportion if you compare, say, Montana's "per person" vote to California's... and there may be ways to "fix" this, without abandoning the system entirely. I am very worried that a national popular vote (which I'm not saying you've necessarily endorsed yet...) would completely change the themes of elections. The two coasts. Urban issues. Currently, in Minnesota, governor and senate races take place in Minneapolis/St. Paul... and that's it. (I guess, with the exception of alternative fuel being a pretty big issue last fall...) I believe the electoral college serves an important purpose, and even though I agree with some of the concerns (swing state attention, third party irrelevance...) I am not so sure they outweigh what I consider the positives...
It's Thanksgiving, why am I doing this?
__________________ "A six-week trial over the issue yielded 'overwhelming evidence' establishing that intelligent design 'is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory,' said Jones, a Republican and a churchgoer appointed to the federal bench three years ago."
"People gave ear to an upstart astrologer who strove to show that the earth revolves, not the heavens or the firmament, the sun and the moon…. This fool wishes to reverse the entire science of astronomy; but sacred scripture tells us that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, and not the earth."
-Martin Luther
"Those who assert that 'the earth moves and turns'...[are] motivated by 'a spirit of bitterness, contradiction, and faultfinding;' possessed by the devil, they aimed 'to pervert the order of nature.'"
-John Calvin |