Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Science
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2007, 07:44 PM   #1
Registered User
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,456
Send a message via AIM to jengoesup
Some physics questions!

Unfortunately I missed the review session for our physics test >> So I have some physics questions I'll be posting here. The first of these is:

An animal rescue plane flying due east at 36.0 m/s drops a bale of hay from an altitude of 60.0 m. If the bale of hay weighs 175 N, what is the momentum of the bale the moment it strikes the ground?

For some reason, in addition to the momentum the teacher gave me the angle at which it was below the horizon. Could someone please show me the work in detail to this problem? Please explain what all of your variables mean, just in case my text uses different variables.

Thanks!

__________________
~Jen

jengoesup is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 03-15-2007, 07:49 PM   #2
Band
 
MrCrabby's Avatar
 

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,622
Send a message via AIM to MrCrabby Send a message via MSN to MrCrabby
Well, when it hits the ground, it will have zero momentum.


Somehow, I doubt that was what you were looking for...
MrCrabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 07:49 PM   #3
Registered User
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,456
Send a message via AIM to jengoesup
Well he really means the moment before it hits the ground...poorly worded question. The answer isn't zero, though.
__________________
~Jen

jengoesup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 07:56 PM   #4
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,716
Do you know if they just want the downward momentum? Otherwise, this could get messy.
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 07:57 PM   #5
Registered User
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,456
Send a message via AIM to jengoesup
I think they just want the downward momentum. I've typed the question exactly as my textbook has put it...the answer my teacher gave me was 888 kg x m/s at 43.6º below the horizon.
__________________
~Jen

jengoesup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 08:16 PM   #6
Registered User
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,456
Send a message via AIM to jengoesup
I just figured it out. hooray
__________________
~Jen

jengoesup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 08:16 PM   #7
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,716
Ok.

Force = mass * acceleration

Force = 175 N
Acceleration = 9.8 m/s2

Thus, mass = 175/9.8 = approximately 17.857 kg

Density = mass * velocity

To determine velocity, we need to know how long it takes the object to reach the ground.

Distance fallen = 1/2 g * t2

Where g is the acceleration of gravity (9.8m/s2) and t is time falling.

In other words:

time falling = sqrt(2*distance/g)

Distance = 60m

2d/g = approximately 12.245

sqrt(2d/g) = time falling = approximately 3.499

Now, we take the speed at 3.499 caused by the acceleration of gravity, which is simply the acceleration of gravity times the time.

9.8 * 3.499 = approximately 32.293 m/s

That's the velocity part of the momentum equation.

BUT, velocity is a vector, which means it also has a direction. To find the direction you will need to find the angle of impact based on an impact speed of 32.293 m/s down and 36.0 m/s east. To do this, you need to take the arctangent of 36/32.293, which is approximately 48.1 degrees, but I haven't the slightest idea how to report this in the answer.

In any event, the magnitude of the momentum is velocity times mass

32.293m/s * 17.857 kg = approximately 576.66 kg*m/s
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 08:17 PM   #8
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,716
Now I'm wondering how I got a different answer...
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 08:29 PM   #9
Be happy
 
bobthecockroach's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 19,716
Yeah, ok, I forgot to combine the vectors before calculating the impact velocity.
__________________
Some things are meant together, some things are better apart
Some things are easy, when other times they are hard
But that doesn’t mean what’s hard isn’t what’s meant to be
- Al Lewis
bobthecockroach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 08:57 PM   #10
Registered User
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,456
Send a message via AIM to jengoesup
Thanks for taking the time to figure it out *nod*
__________________
~Jen

jengoesup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2007, 10:09 PM   #11
Band
 
MrCrabby's Avatar
 

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,622
Send a message via AIM to MrCrabby Send a message via MSN to MrCrabby
Quote:
Originally Posted by jengoesup View Post
I just figured it out. hooray
Glad we could help.
MrCrabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 PM.