Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Music & Musicians > Hardware > Amps & Accessories
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2006, 11:01 PM   #16
Algebraic!
 
thesteve's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 24,454
Send a message via AIM to thesteve
Quote:
Originally Posted by What5647 View Post
also, i see no reason for a limit at a set number of stages, with different stages you could easily change the number of stages needed to get a full suqare wave.
This is sorta what I'm thinking. Suppose there was no variable "gain circuit"...what if all you had were stages? Why couldn't you spread your stages out and have 20 different, and sequentially heavier gain stages?

__________________
We've all got ideas. We are the music makers. We make money to buy things, and write down words.

My old band, The Morning Glass.
thesteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 08-30-2006, 11:05 PM   #17
Sarcasm? What's that?
 
What5647's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,708
yeah, i you and i are thinking along the same lines. i'd say the "reason" you couldn't is simply cost since you need at least one transistor or tube for each gain circuit (not so sure on the tube part-they don't teach how tubes work anymore. atleast not were i go to school) the costs and complexity would get pretty high pretty quick.
__________________

electric guitars: carvin bolt, cort z22
acoustic guitar: cort earth 200gc
amps: carvin VL100 legacy head, peavey rockmaster pre, carvin sx200c
effects: krank distortus maximus
cab: mesa oversized recto 4x12
What5647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:11 PM   #18
Algebraic!
 
thesteve's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 24,454
Send a message via AIM to thesteve
Quote:
Originally Posted by What5647 View Post
yeah, i you and i are thinking along the same lines. i'd say the "reason" you couldn't is simply cost since you need at least one transistor or tube for each gain circuit (not so sure on the tube part-they don't teach how tubes work anymore. atleast not were i go to school) the costs and complexity would get pretty high pretty quick.
I don't know alot about circuits, but I wouldn't think it'd get too complex if you're just repeating the same basic thing over and over. Now it might get crowded and force creativity.

And as far as costs go, last I looked for them, transistors were dirt cheap.
__________________
We've all got ideas. We are the music makers. We make money to buy things, and write down words.

My old band, The Morning Glass.
thesteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:17 PM   #19
Sarcasm? What's that?
 
What5647's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,708
yeah, but tubes aren't. and things are normally considered more complex when more parts are added, and yes it would be the same thing over and over. but you probably still see what i'm saying, the same effect can be accomplished with only a few stages, as opposed to spreading it out over 20 or so.

just as i typed this, i remembered something i worked on last semester that talked about how each type (kinda a class, but not like class a, a/b stuff) of amp has a maximum amount of distortion. i think this is what axguitar was thinking of, with each gain stage maxed, there would be a limit of how many preamps you could use. but again, if you're spreading all this out over 20 stages, it isn't an issue. i'll look that up tomorrow, and i'll post what i find, i know exactly were it was in the book.
__________________

electric guitars: carvin bolt, cort z22
acoustic guitar: cort earth 200gc
amps: carvin VL100 legacy head, peavey rockmaster pre, carvin sx200c
effects: krank distortus maximus
cab: mesa oversized recto 4x12
What5647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:26 PM   #20
Algebraic!
 
thesteve's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 24,454
Send a message via AIM to thesteve
Quote:
Originally Posted by What5647 View Post
yeah, but tubes aren't. and things are normally considered more complex when more parts are added, and yes it would be the same thing over and over. but you probably still see what i'm saying, the same effect can be accomplished with only a few stages, as opposed to spreading it out over 20 or so.
Oh...this is definitely true. The whole purpose of a "gain" knob is to control the amount of signal that's going to go through the clipping process. My idea is definitely looking at theoretical limits and ignoring practicality.
__________________
We've all got ideas. We are the music makers. We make money to buy things, and write down words.

My old band, The Morning Glass.
thesteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2006, 11:33 PM   #21
Sarcasm? What's that?
 
What5647's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,708
exactly.
heck, with the gain at zero, you could theoretically add thousands of stages.
i will look at some of this stuff in more detail tomorrow, there might be something on minimum gain for each class that i'm forgetting.
if there is, that would really blow our theories out of the water, huh?
__________________

electric guitars: carvin bolt, cort z22
acoustic guitar: cort earth 200gc
amps: carvin VL100 legacy head, peavey rockmaster pre, carvin sx200c
effects: krank distortus maximus
cab: mesa oversized recto 4x12
What5647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 12:49 AM   #22
Algebraic!
 
thesteve's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 24,454
Send a message via AIM to thesteve
Quote:
Originally Posted by What5647 View Post
exactly.
heck, with the gain at zero, you could theoretically add thousands of stages.
i will look at some of this stuff in more detail tomorrow, there might be something on minimum gain for each class that i'm forgetting.
if there is, that would really blow our theories out of the water, huh?
I realized there's an easier way to test the "11 stage limit" theory.

I wonder if it's feasible to run the effects send of a Peavey 5150 to the input of another 5150...then you'd have 12 gain stages hitting the power section...I think.
__________________
We've all got ideas. We are the music makers. We make money to buy things, and write down words.

My old band, The Morning Glass.
thesteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 09:20 AM   #23
Good Grief!!!
 

Joined: Feb 2001
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 4,748
From what I know about amps (which is more than the average layperson, and considerably less than say, Major Tom), there should not be a theoretical limit to the number of gain stages that could be placed in a theoretical amplifier.

Speaking practically, however, each stage:

1) Takes up space
2) Adds weight
3) Expands the potential for irritating noise (just think about what would happen if the first tube in even a 6 stage amp went even slightly microphonic).
4) At some point, can no longer effectively re-shape the sound as perceived by the human ear.

I would guess these practical considerations are why most amplifiers have a single-digit number of gain stages.

Nate
__________________
Which direction is really up, anyway???
nate95366 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2006, 09:59 AM   #24
Sarcasm? What's that?
 
What5647's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,708
or you could also probably test it out with multiple boost pedals, all chain in a row.
__________________

electric guitars: carvin bolt, cort z22
acoustic guitar: cort earth 200gc
amps: carvin VL100 legacy head, peavey rockmaster pre, carvin sx200c
effects: krank distortus maximus
cab: mesa oversized recto 4x12
What5647 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2006, 04:48 PM   #25
Bulldogge
Administrator
 
BillSPrestonEsq's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Beaverton, Or
Posts: 37,719
paid
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesteve View Post
I realized there's an easier way to test the "11 stage limit" theory.

I wonder if it's feasible to run the effects send of a Peavey 5150 to the input of another 5150...then you'd have 12 gain stages hitting the power section...I think.
I have seen that done by a royal idiot with a pair of rockmaster's. I am not sure exactly how many that is, but my first guess would be 12.

Then again. Assuming my rockmaster's lead channel engages 3 12ax7's that would be six gain stages. There are 2 more 12ax7's in the classic 120 providing 4 more. Then there are the 4 power tubes providing at least 1 more, meaning that with no pedals, my rockmaster setup has 11 at the minimmum. Then don't forget that I have a 12db boost in the eq section, by the eq, and I am at at least 12.
__________________
For this I will be judged.


My Life.



POW!
BillSPrestonEsq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2006, 04:49 PM   #26
Bulldogge
Administrator
 
BillSPrestonEsq's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Beaverton, Or
Posts: 37,719
paid
I consider high gain when the entire signal is distorted and you no longer get a portion of the signal unnaffected by the distortion.
__________________
For this I will be judged.


My Life.



POW!
BillSPrestonEsq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 06:56 PM   #27
Registered User
 
shreadhead's Avatar
 

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainer. View Post

Hi-gain distortion: sound is always distorted, does not clean up when picked softly, and chords will not decay to clean if held for a few seconds
Over-the-top: more gain than typical hi-gain distortion
Ok then where does that leave my Fender Prosonics ( 6 12AX7's in the pre and dual cascading gain controlls for the crunch channel ) ? I consider them to have over the top UBER gain ( heck there is so much gain high quality CABLES are slightly microphonic with um ) BUT they respond VERY well to touch and tecnique. I can clean up well with just the guitar volume knob then roar back in with infinate sustain and feedback squeels. There is MUCH more preamp gain in these than in a 5150 yet they will still clean up with the volume knob.
__________________
My "stuff"
Guitars -
Carvins 1988 V220R, 1990 X220C,
Washburn USA Customs
1993 MG 104
one off handbuilt prototype for the MG 122,
1995 MG100, MG102,MG 120, MG 122.
1999 WM-4
2000 3-ST STEALTH
1988 Takamine LTD 88
1982 Alverez Yairi DY-53 Silver Harp
Fender Prosonic combo
Red lizzard one off Bruce Zinky handbuilt 120 watt Fender Prosonic head with reverb
Yamaha 4/12 loaded with Vin 30's top and WGS Vet 30's bottom.
Fender 2/12 and Red Avatar 2/12 both loaded with G12T 75 watt Celestians .
shreadhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2006, 07:10 PM   #28
I'm on a horse.
Super Moderator
 
Rainer.'s Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle, WA.
Posts: 26,964
Send a message via AIM to Rainer.
No word definition is gonna perfectly describe tone. I also consider my Yamaha (also has 6 preamp tubes that deal with the amp preamp, one more deals with the reverb) to have definite over-the-top gain as well once the gain knob gets past 7 (I would also add that this particular gain stage is much fatter sounding than normal hi-gain). The tone of each hi gain amp/pedal will be different. My definitions deal with just the clipping and distortion structure of the output waveform.
__________________
. . . j o n : [ FLICKR \ BLOG ]

Rainer. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 04:27 PM   #29
ERG guitars > All
 
Forged by Fire's Avatar
 

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 481
This is high gain
Forged by Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:11 AM.