[guitarmonkey<><]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

thats under the assumption i call the police, and why are you taking this burner to my eye?

It was in the movie. I don't know, it was an analogy.
Which one would you prefer, they are both equal so you say.

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq

which would you prefer. Since you are saying they are equal...

burner, that way i dont have to look at your avatar anymore, look your not gonna get anymore serious answers out of me, this conversation is going nowhere, its going back and forth, no one sopinion is changing here

[guitarmonkey<><]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

burner, that way i dont have to look at your avatar anymore, look your not gonna get anymore serious answers out of me, this conversation is going nowhere, its going back and forth, no one sopinion is changing here

No one ever was taking you seriously. The assumption that calling someone a name and killing them are the same is ridiculous.

[BillSPrestonEsq]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

burner, that way i dont have to look at your avatar anymore, look your not gonna get anymore serious answers out of me, this conversation is going nowhere, its going back and forth, no one sopinion is changing here

You really have not made a serious point. A 3 year old could see through your argument.

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq

You really have not made a serious point. A 3 year old could see through your argument.

there you go im 3 because i see things different from you

[guitarmonkey<><]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

there you go im 3 because i see things different from you

He didn't call you three. He said a three year old could see how ridiculous your 'view' was.

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by guitarmonkey<><

No one ever was taking you seriously. The assumption that calling someone a name and killing them are the same is ridiculous.

im glad no one took me serious othe wise there might have been 2 pages arguing with me...thanks for the laughs guys

[oh, that kid!]

i really think my whole point was lost, no where did i say calling names was as bad as killing in real life, but you took it that way, so i played along, it would be dumb to believe that, but with entertainmant, movies and tv shows which are fake anguish is anguish, we get enjoy out of both, be i physical or mental

[BillSPrestonEsq]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

i really think my whole point was lost, no where did i say calling names was as bad as killing in real life, but you took it that way, so i played along, it would be dumb to believe that, but with entertainmant, movies and tv shows which are fake anguish is anguish, we get enjoy out of both, be i physical or mental

actually, your first post did say that.

right here:

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

now to say people being tortured s wrong and perverse, is it anymore perverse than american idol, people spend all this time practicing and worrying only to eb shot down, insulted and flat out humiliated by some prick in a baby gap t - shirt? these people are in emotional pain but that doesnt count right?

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq

actually, your first post did say that.

right here:

ok, i see where thats confusing, becuase technically american idol is a "reality show", but we all know reality shows are about as real as kraft cheese slices so idont think of it as real life,... but i should used a better example

[BillSPrestonEsq]

The thing is, why is there not a difference between enjoying torture and people making fools of themselves?

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq

The thing is, why is there not a difference between enjoying torture and people making fools of themselves?

well, again thats just a difference is how we view that show, yes there are people like william hung(i dont know if thats how his name is spelled or not) who know there not gonna make it, but most of the people on that show honestly think they have what it takes, and that british guy( i dont know his name) just tears them apart, and its a selling point for that show that this guy destroys peoples dreams

[guitarmonkey<><]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

well, again thats just a difference is how we view that show, yes there are people like william hung(i dont know if thats how his name is spelled or not) who know there not gonna make it, but most of the people on that show honestly think they have what it takes, and that british guy( i dont know his name) just tears them apart, and its a selling point for that show that this guy destroys peoples dreams

Because that is what it takeas to be a singer. You can't be mildly good. He is helping them, most of them thing they are amazing vocalists and give up jobs, school, everything because they think they are so great. He has been a producer for 20+ years, he knows whatt good is. they were the ones that tried out, if they don't want to be told they suck, don't go on american idol. I would rather be told I suck then go through illusions of granduer and do absoluitely nothing with my life.

[BillSPrestonEsq]

Originally Posted by oh, that kid!

well, again thats just a difference is how we view that show, yes there are people like william hung(i dont know if thats how his name is spelled or not) who know there not gonna make it, but most of the people on that show honestly think they have what it takes, and that british guy( i dont know his name) just tears them apart, and its a selling point for that show that this guy destroys peoples dreams

Big difference between that than feeding someone their liver though. Heck, Ive been told I suck at lots of things.

[oh, that kid!]

Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq

Big difference between that than feeding someone their liver though. Heck, Ive been told I suck at lots of things.

well i agree in the real world yes, handing some theri liver is pretty harsh, but this is entertainment, i see no difference, its all dramatized anguish, just different ways of going about it