[BillSPrestonEsq]

Originally Posted by guitarmonkey<><

I think hydrogen is the answer too. We need to devote more research to it to make it affordable. Right now, it costs five times the amount of oil to produce. That would be the equivalent of eighteen dollars a gallon in gas.

That dead cat thing, is absoulute genius. I cannot believe enviromentalists are not pushing for that. 1) It stops disease, by removing dead cats. 2) It has a waste not effieciency, take a dead cat, you are using all of the cat. Keep it as a pet, it dies, you shove it in your car, provides you with fuel for a week, and you get a new cat. A perfect circle if there ever was one.

I seriously doubt it would provide much per cat.

[JerryLove]

I htink hydrogen is a distraction. I think it's trying to focus the country on a technology that cannot be ready for decades so as to have a pre-bult safety when they don't show any actual improvement for years.

I think it's fine and dand to look at (BTW, getting hydrogen costs energy), and good to persue, but I think we need more immediate goals as well. I think we need to look at what we can do today and tomorrow, as well as down the road.

I like Hybrids, I like high-effecieny engines, I like mass-transit, I like better urban planning.

[adamwagg]

Originally Posted by JerryLove

I htink hydrogen is a distraction. I think it's trying to focus the country on a technology that cannot be ready for decades so as to have a pre-bult safety when they don't show any actual improvement for years.

I think it's fine and dand to look at (BTW, getting hydrogen costs energy), and good to persue, but I think we need more immediate goals as well. I think we need to look at what we can do today and tomorrow, as well as down the road.

I like Hybrids, I like high-effecieny engines, I like mass-transit, I like better urban planning.

I am always a big fan of solar power and I think more money should be put into this area.

[adamwagg]

Originally Posted by JerryLove

I htink hydrogen is a distraction. I think it's trying to focus the country on a technology that cannot be ready for decades so as to have a pre-bult safety when they don't show any actual improvement for years.

I think it's fine and dand to look at (BTW, getting hydrogen costs energy), and good to persue, but I think we need more immediate goals as well. I think we need to look at what we can do today and tomorrow, as well as down the road.

I like Hybrids, I like high-effecieny engines, I like mass-transit, I like better urban planning.

The problem with better urban planning is it is hard to fix, so to speak, a city that isnt well planned.

[Ted Logan]

The link now says that the inventor has denied using dead cats. He says he made the organic diesel out of paper, plastic, textiles, and garbage.

I am incredibly crestfallen. I can't support a biodiesel that doesn't include deceased domesticated animal carcasses.