Go Back   Christian Guitar Forum > Community > Academic > Government & Economics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2005, 06:03 PM   #31
Registered User
 
Dark Tofu's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 489
correct me if i'm wrong but in socialism everyone gets paid the same amount and IMO the government of socialism is muy malo.

Dark Tofu is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-20-2005, 09:08 AM   #32
New Avatar Shortly
 
Ridley's Own's Avatar
 

Joined: Apr 2002
Location: Maryville TN
Posts: 4,919
Send a message via MSN to Ridley's Own
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Tofu
correct me if i'm wrong but in socialism everyone gets paid the same amount and IMO the government of socialism is muy malo.
No. Socialism is where the state owns the means of production. If the U.S. were socialist, General Electric will still make lightbulbs and do all the things they still do, except GE would be owned by the government. The idea is that if the means of creation of capital is in the hands of the people (via the democratic process), then there's less of a chance the capitalists will oppress the proletariat.

I don't know anyone who advocates paying everyone, regardless of ability or need, the exact same wage.
__________________
Ridley+
Ridley's Own is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 11:59 AM   #33
|Last of the Gang to Die|
 
TheProdigalModern's Avatar
 

Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Commonwealth of Louisiana
Posts: 1,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridley's Own
I don't know anyone who advocates paying everyone, regardless of ability or need, the exact same wage.
Ron Sider does, at least sort of. If I understood him correctly, he calls for a fairly high minimum wage and a fairly low maximum take-home, with what isn't taken home being given to government programs.
__________________
Disclaimer: Any posts made before Nov. 2010 reflect vastly different stages of my life. I repent for all of them. I am sure this is not the last time I will say it.

[My CGR Blog]

The Less Fine Things
[CGR's guide to frugal living]
TheProdigalModern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 12:22 PM   #34
Bulldogge
Administrator
 
BillSPrestonEsq's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Beaverton, Or
Posts: 37,719
paid
Id be for a national sales tax and abolition of income. Big spenders would be penalized. Buying a yacht would generate a heck of a lot of tax revenue, whereas my groceries and gas would generate a comparitively small amount. It would hit people equally, but based upon their expenditures.
__________________
For this I will be judged.


My Life.



POW!
BillSPrestonEsq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 01:10 PM   #35
Real candidate of change
 
JerryLove's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,259
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
Quote:
Id be for a national sales tax and abolition of income. Big spenders would be penalized. Buying a yacht would generate a heck of a lot of tax revenue, whereas my groceries and gas would generate a comparitively small amount. It would hit people equally, but based upon their expenditures.
I don't know about you; but I spend a lot more on groceries than I do on yahts.

A flat sales tax disproportionately affects the poor; as they have very little in the way of discretionary spending... of course, most sales taxes exempt groceries.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 01:17 PM   #36
Bulldogge
Administrator
 
BillSPrestonEsq's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Beaverton, Or
Posts: 37,719
paid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryLove
I don't know about you; but I spend a lot more on groceries than I do on yahts.

A flat sales tax disproportionately affects the poor; as they have very little in the way of discretionary spending... of course, most sales taxes exempt groceries.

as do I, say make groceries exempt and the rest is based on lifestyle. Taxes of the opulent would be opulent, whereas the frugal would pay a relatively low tax.
__________________
For this I will be judged.


My Life.



POW!
BillSPrestonEsq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 01:34 PM   #37
Registered User
 

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 265
I like the flat tax, but I don't expect it to ever happen. There are interests who want the tax code to be complex and subject to political forces.

To me, a flat tax would be apolitical.
dcunning30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2005, 04:26 PM   #38
Aussie Aussie Aussie
 
adamwagg's Avatar
 

Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,078
We have the GST (flat sales tax of 10% on everything bought though only at the consumer end - with about the only exemption un prepared food) over here now for the last about 5 years.

It doesnt seem to have made much difference to anything really, plus we have had a number of income tax drops.
__________________
posted by Ads

http://www.horizoncc.org.au/
adamwagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2005, 06:08 AM   #39
Real candidate of change
 
JerryLove's Avatar
 

Joined: Sep 2001
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 17,259
Send a message via AIM to JerryLove
The actual sales-tax numbers are going to be pretty high.

I'm really curious what that would do to the housing market (or will those be exempt too?) I can't imagine what tacking 30%+ to the cost of a house as a non-recoverable tax will do.

Since currenly more than 25% of my income goes straight to income tax; and I have a 7% sales tax, and I have property taxes that are 10% of my income; I'm at a 42% sales tax thusfar minimally.
JerryLove is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 AM.