| Welcome to the Christian Guitar Forum. | Welcome to Christian Guitar, the world's largest Christian guitar resource and forum community where over 150,000 Christian music fans from around the world come to discuss all Christian music, living the Christian life, current events, etc. in over 3,000,000 posted discussions!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and photo galleries. By joining our FREE community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), blog about your Christian journey, suggest and share guitar tabs, see LESS forum advertisements, upload photos in your own photo album and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
11-02-2009, 01:05 PM
|
#106 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq | I think can do it. What I would end up doing is building the amp to handle 6V6 tubes but keeping the specs low enough to also be able to handle 6K6 tubes as a drop in replacement. It will be cathode biased anyway, so you're looking at potentially being able to run 6L6GC, 6V6, 6K6, KT66, 5881, and EL34 tubes in any combination of two you wish, not to mention EL84's through a THD yellowjacket or equivalent Octal/Noval converter device. I'll tinker with this idea a bit. Either drop-in replacements running higher-powered tubes at lower levels (which would result in lower wattage, possibly) to make sure everything can just be dropped-in, or some kind of switch for each socket to run the tubes at different specs. That sound good? |
| |
11-02-2009, 01:11 PM
|
#107 | | Squidlipsistan Administrator
Joined: Jun 2001 Location: OC Posts: 31,710
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jėssȋca I think can do it. What I would end up doing is building the amp to handle 6V6 tubes but keeping the specs low enough to also be able to handle 6K6 tubes as a drop in replacement. It will be cathode biased anyway, so you're looking at potentially being able to run 6L6GC, 6V6, 6K6, KT66, 5881, and EL34 tubes in any combination of two you wish, not to mention EL84's through a THD yellowjacket or equivalent Octal/Noval converter device. I'll tinker with this idea a bit. Either drop-in replacements running higher-powered tubes at lower levels (which would result in lower wattage, possibly) to make sure everything can just be dropped-in, or some kind of switch for each socket to run the tubes at different specs. That sound good? | Yeah, please pm me a price. I am seriously interested. |
| |
11-02-2009, 01:26 PM
|
#108 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSPrestonEsq Yeah, please pm me a price. I am seriously interested. | As soon as we have one, you'll be the first to know. We're shooting to have a working prototype finished before the second week of December. We should know how much its going to cost in a couple of weeks, because starting tomorrow we're going into hyperdrive with R&D.
Next time I get a sum of money, I'm going to build two CAT-5 connectors, hook up audio in/out on each one, put our buffer design before the output of one end, and see if the footswitch effects loop will sound the way people would want it to. Watch... this idea is going to catch on, everyone is going to copy it, and we'll start seeing production CAT-5 cables rated for audio.
Last edited by RubberChipmunk; 11-02-2009 at 02:28 PM.
Reason: Apparently, its Cat-5, not Cat-V.
|
| |
11-02-2009, 01:34 PM
|
#109 | | Squidlipsistan Administrator
Joined: Jun 2001 Location: OC Posts: 31,710
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jėssȋca Next time I get a sum of money, I'm going to build two CAT-V connectors, hook up audio in/out on each one, put our buffer design before the output of one end, and see if the footswitch effects loop will sound the way people would want it to. Watch... this idea is going to catch on, everyone is going to copy it, and we'll start seeing production CAT-V cables rated for audio.  | Honestly, it is insane. Could be one of the best ideas I have heard of in a while on a classic tube amp. |
| |
11-02-2009, 02:35 PM
|
#110 | | is a straight up Rainer.
Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Seattle, WA. Posts: 20,164
| Hey, Jėss. Nice to have you back! |
| |
11-02-2009, 03:11 PM
|
#111 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainer. Hey, Jėss. Nice to have you back!  | Its nice to be back, Jon! |
| |
11-06-2009, 10:59 AM
|
#112 | | Boom De Yada!
Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Nashville Posts: 7,053
| So I came in here to hear more about your amp project... I'm looking into getting an amp in the next month or two...
Dual channels/switching and effects loops are big things for me. A built in boost would be nice, but not really a necessity. If I understand what you're thinking with the CAT5 cable, that would be amazing. Instead of having one cable running to the input, one to the fxsend and one to the effect return, simply one cat5 cable... I
I know you don't have an official price, but what sort of price range are you thinking? |
| |
11-06-2009, 04:37 PM
|
#113 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustin So I came in here to hear more about your amp project... I'm looking into getting an amp in the next month or two...
Dual channels/switching and effects loops are big things for me. A built in boost would be nice, but not really a necessity. If I understand what you're thinking with the CAT5 cable, that would be amazing. Instead of having one cable running to the input, one to the fxsend and one to the effect return, simply one cat5 cable... I
I know you don't have an official price, but what sort of price range are you thinking? | There will be a switchable buffer after the footswitch's loop, but not exactly a boost circuit. I can probably add a micro amp clone with volume and switch into the footswitch, post-loop but pre-buffer as a custom option. It would boost the signal a bit going into the power amp.
I really hate to quote a price right now, but I'm estimating it be around the $800-900 range. |
| |
11-06-2009, 04:58 PM
|
#114 | | Boom De Yada!
Joined: Jun 2003 Location: Nashville Posts: 7,053
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Jėssȋca There will be a switchable buffer after the footswitch's loop, but not exactly a boost circuit. I can probably add a micro amp clone with volume and switch into the footswitch, post-loop but pre-buffer as a custom option. It would boost the signal a bit going into the power amp.
I really hate to quote a price right now, but I'm estimating it be around the $800-900 range. | Ah no biggie... I have a boost pedal.. I just always like the built-in amp boosts.
Cool. I totally understand the price is extremely flexible. And we're talking for just a head right?
Definitely looking forward to hearing what you've got in the works.  Keep us posted. |
| |
11-06-2009, 05:09 PM
|
#115 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustin Ah no biggie... I have a boost pedal.. I just always like the built-in amp boosts.
Cool. I totally understand the price is extremely flexible. And we're talking for just a head right?
Definitely looking forward to hearing what you've got in the works.  Keep us posted. | Yes, that price is just for the head. We may make combo versions as well, which would cost a bit more.
I'm looking forward to getting this thing built. I'll keep everyone as posted as I can. |
| |
11-09-2009, 01:22 AM
|
#116 | | General Catton
Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Florida Posts: 2,931
| So, my estimate was about right. We are definitely looking at the $800-900 price range.
Also after doing some research we're learning that some of our ideas may be completely pointless in this amp. Too tired to really talk about it right now, but we are having to make a choice between two features, because it would be counterproductive to include both. |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:19 PM. |